Judge in Michigan clears the way for more absentee ballots to be counted in November
A judge on Friday cleared the way for more absentee ballots to be counted in Michigan, saying envelopes postmarked by the eve of the Nov. 3 election are eligible, even if they show up days later.
The decision is significant in a state that is anticipating waves of absentee ballots this fall; about 2.3 million have already been requested. For absentee ballots to be counted, Michigan law requires them to be received by the time polls close on election day.
Court of Claims Judge Cynthia Stephens said there’s a crucial need for flexibility in 2020. “The evidence in this case stands uncontroverted and establishes that the mail system is currently fraught with delays and uncertainty in light of the COVID-19 pandemic,” Stephens said.
An absentee ballot can be counted if postmarked by Nov. 2 and received within 14 days after the election, said Stephens, who noted that it can take two weeks to certify Michigan election results anyway.
The judge’s order could cause a delay in declaring winners in some races. President Trump won Michigan by 10,000 votes in 2016.
These states will probably decide if Joe Biden or President Trump wins the election. And their absentee ballot laws could determine when we find out.
The state doesn’t plan to appeal Stephens’ decision, said Ryan Jarvi, a spokesman for Atty. Gen. Dana Nessel, a Democrat. “With the November election quickly approaching, voters and local clerks need certainty — and these decisions provide that,” Jarvi said.
Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, also a Democrat, had been urging the Republican-controlled Legislature to allow the counting of absentee ballots that arrive two days after the election. She didn’t criticize the court ruling, though she was a defendant in the lawsuit. Benson’s advice to voters now: Don’t hold an absentee ballot until the last minute.
“No eligible voter should be disenfranchised through no fault of their own for exercising their right to vote by mail,” she said.
The Michigan Republican Party accused Nessel and Benson of failing to aggressively defend existing laws. They’re “standing idle hoping that their political party will benefit from legal chaos,” Republican chairwoman Laura Cox said.
Separately, a federal judge on Thursday blocked Michigan’s long-standing ban on transporting voters to the polls. It’s a misdemeanor to hire drivers to take voters to polling places unless they’re unable to walk.
U.S. District Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis suspended enforcement of the law. A form of the ban has been on the books since 1895.
The ban had been challenged by groups that include Priorities USA, a liberal super PAC that has said it plans to spend millions mobilizing and turning out voters in the battleground state.
A look at where President Trump and Joe Biden stand on key issues in the 2020 election, including healthcare, immigration, police reform and climate.
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
