Reflagging of Oil Tankers
With respect to the Persian Gulf, an Egyptian official says that the reflagging “could put the whole region . . . even the world at risk.” A Western diplomat asks, “What . . . if the tanker war escalates as a result of the U.S. presence? Does (the U.S.) become sucked into a vicious and unpredictable war?” (July 16)
At the same time Sen. Sam Nunn (D-Georgia), an opponent of the scheme, says, “If the Administration abandons its commitment to Kuwait, U.S. credibility in the region will suffer.” (July 12) And an Arab diplomat is quoted, “(a) cut-and-run scenario would shred what remains of U.S. credibility in this part of the world. . .” (July 16)
And so the drift to war begins--if those of us who oppose the escalation of the Iraq-Iran war permit the credibility issue, which has the trappings of a self-fulfilling prophecy, to paralyze our thinking. The Security Council resolution, with its promise of a concerted international effort not merely to contain the war but to end it requires enthusiastic support. Peace is never easy to achieve--but it is never impossible either.
JANET V. KELBLEY
Rancho Palos Verdes
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.