Advertisement

Future of Nixon Site Is Clouded by Dispute : Library May Not Get Key Papers

Share via
Times Staff Writer

Gerald R. Ford has a presidential library in Ann Arbor, Mich. Jimmy Carter has one in his home state of Georgia. And Ronald Reagan hopes to break ground for his in Ventura County next fall.

But Richard M. Nixon, who preceded all three men to the White House, has yet to find a home for the mementoes of his stormy presidency.

This week, the City of Yorba Linda is expected to announce the details of a legal agreement between the Orange County city and the Richard Nixon Presidential Archives Foundation to build the library, said John C. Whitaker, executive director of the foundation.

Advertisement

Papers in Custody

But the long-awaited Richard Nixon Presidential Library stands to be the first presidential library without presidential papers.

The federal government took custody of Nixon’s presidential materials--44 million pages and 4,000 hours of tape recordings--when he tried to have some of them destroyed.

They now sit in a warehouse in Alexandria, Va., where national archivists sift through, removing classified information.

Advertisement

Nixon and members of his former Administration have fought the National Archives to prevent public release of selected parts of the materials, particularly those known as the Special White House Papers from the Watergate period.

The eight other presidential libraries are operated by the National Archives, but Nixon’s initially will be privately operated.

“The question isn’t whether Nixon can operate his own library, but what’s going to go in it?” said a former House subcommittee staff member familiar with presidential libraries.

Advertisement

Materials Available

According to Nixon Foundation director Whitaker, the library initially will include Nixon’s vice presidential papers, all his personal papers since he’s been out of office, manuscripts for his six books and his personal White House diaries.

The foundation will contract with a museum company to plan and build the exhibits, which will probably focus on Nixon’s work with China, the Middle East, arms control, and domestic issues, Whitaker said.

“There will not be a lot of glass containers with dusty items in them,” he said.

And there will be a section on Watergate. “The (former) President feels it was part of his presidency,” Whitaker said.

Nixon himself, when he toured a proposed site in San Clemente four years ago, told the media that the museum would not ignore Watergate.

“The Watergate episode of course is part of the history of the times . . . (it) will be seen in perspective, and that’s the way it should be,” he said then.

The foundation anticipates that the library and museum will bring 500,000 visitors to Yorba Linda, Nixon’s birthplace, each year. It will be built with $25 million in private donations.

Advertisement

Inclusion of Watergate

Four years ago, when San Clemente was the prospective site for the Nixon library, officials there asked the Nixon Foundation to sign a written agreement to ensure that the facility would provide a balanced presentation of Nixon’s presidency and include items on Watergate.

But Yorba Linda, which recently won the library after San Clemente delayed approval for four years, has not considered a similar agreement.

“Any presidential library is going to have a certain bias. We’re not, at least thus far, involved in the particular content of the library,” City Manager Art Simonian said.

Some critics have taken the bias charge even further, claiming that presidential libraries are empty, fake monuments that deify former Presidents, John Stewart, acting director of the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library in Boston, said.

“I think they (presidential libraries) have all done very well in not exaggerating and not blowing the Presidents out of proportion,” Stewart said. “But just the fact that you have an institution on the life of one person, that’s a biased statement. You’re coming to a conclusion about this person--that he was great enough to have this institution.”

Emphasis on Nostalgia

Most people visit presidential libraries because they liked the former President, he said. For example, many admittedly visit the Kennedy Library for a nostalgia trip, “and they usually get it,” Stewart said.

Advertisement

Although they are called libraries, it is the museum that attracts the visitors. The Kennedy museum presents the family history, from 1840 when Kennedy’s grandparents immigrated to the United States from Ireland.

By far the most popular exhibit is the collection of film clips from Kennedy’s press conferences, Stewart said.

Similarly, the Jimmy Carter Presidential library in Atlanta, which opened Oct. 1, 1986, offers a video taped question-and-answer section, where the visitor can select from a series of 100 questions, punch a button, and view Carter’s pre-recorded answer. (Whitaker said the Nixon museum will offer something similar).

The Carter library has several exhibits on his presidency--such as the Middle East, Camp David talks, and the Iran hostage crisis--and the office of the presidency in general, as well as a replica of Carter’s Oval Office.

“I’m sure there are things in the museum he (Carter) would just as soon forget about his presidency, such as the hostage crisis,” said Martin Elzy, assistant director at the Carter Library, where in January, the National Archives opened 6 million of the 27 million pages of Carter’s presidential papers.

Trying Not to Offend

Elzy said that a great deal of care went into designing the exhibits in the Carter library to present a balanced view of his presidency.

Advertisement

“Some of the things may appear bland, because it tries not to offend anyone,” Elzy said.

Designing a presidential library is tricky, Stewart said. To be successful it must fall some where between bland and decadent.

“These places can be very schlocky,” he said. “They can be horrible if the people putting them together aren’t careful. If you’re trying to create a monument or something that will perpetuate an image that everybody can agree with, then it’s not going to work.”

The Nixon Foundation is planning a two-phase approach to building the library, Whitaker said.

Two Stages of Work

The first phase would include a museum and a library large enough to store the papers Nixon currently has. The second would include building an addition to the library large enough to accommodate the official presidential materials, if an agreement is reached between Nixon and the National Archives.

But both Whitaker and Nixon’s personal assistant, John Taylor, said that it could be years before the impasse is resolved.

After he resigned in 1974, Nixon had reached an agreement with the General Services Administration of the National Archives, which would have allowed him to begin selectively destroying tapes on Sept. 1, 1979, and to destroy all the tapes at the time of his death or on Sept. 1, 1984, whichever came first.

Advertisement

But Congress prevented that by passing the 1974 Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act, taking federal custody of the materials. Questioning the constitutionality of the act, Nixon fought all the way to the Supreme Court, which sided with the government on a 7-2 vote in 1977, stating that presidential papers were the property of the government. (Congress responded in 1978 by revising the 1955 Presidential Libraries Act to read that all presidential papers are the property of the federal government. The law went into effect in 1981).

Basis of Lawsuit

The National Archives began by first processing the White House special files. Nixon then filed suit in 1980, claiming he was entitled to financial compensation because the materials were his private property.

But in 1983, when the National Archives was ready to release 94% of the 1.5 million White House papers (6% remained censored for national security reasons), 29 of Nixon’s associates filed a suit to block the release. Nixon’s attorney hired a legal assistant to read through the 1.5 million pages, looking for what Nixon and his associates considered privileged information.

Nixon’s attorney objected to releasing about 10,500 pages, which a special archives committee has been given to review. The National Archives has the right to reconsider the release of the objected materials. If the review committee decides to open up those papers and if Nixon is dissatisfied, he can take the National Archives to court, said Archives spokeswoman Jill Brett.

In the meantime, the National Archives released 84% of the White House special files earlier this year, along with 1.5 million other pages of domestic papers from the Nixon Administration. Thus far, only 2.5 million pages of the 44 million have been released.

Nixon’s tapes are in the last phase of the archival process and might be released by the end of 1988 or the beginning of 1989, Brett said.

Advertisement

A Tedious Process

“Because the quality of the tapes is very poor the process has taken very many years,” Brett said.

Whether Nixon and the National Archives resolve their differences, it still will take an act of Congress for the Nixon Library to house the presidential papers.

If Nixon and the National Archives do not reach an agreement and Nixon prevails in court, Congress still would have to amend the 1974 act to move the materials from the Virginia warehouse to California.

Until then, the Nixon Foundation can obtain copies of those papers that have been opened through the National Archives at 30 cents apiece--or $750,000 for the first 2.5 million pages.

Advertisement