Advertisement

McMartin Case Closer to Mistrial : Hospitalized Juror Delays Proceedings; 1 Alternate Remains

Share via
Times Staff Writer

The 29-month-long McMartin Pre-School molestation trial edged even closer to a mistrial Thursday as an ailing juror remained hospitalized with an undiagnosed illness.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge William Pounders delayed proceedings until Sept. 11, when the juror will be replaced by the last remaining alternate if he is unable to rejoin the panel. The judge said little time will be lost by the delay, since the court was scheduled to be in session only three days next week and the attorneys can use the down time to work on their closing arguments.

Pounders said the juror’s physician is still awaiting the results of a battery of tests before commenting on the seriousness of his condition, which was initially thought to be a case of shingles.

Advertisement

Jury Has Dwindled

The marathon trial began in April, 1987, with the selection of 12 regular jurors and six alternates, and was expected to last at most one year. Now in its third year, the jury has dwindled over the months to the current 13.

One juror was dismissed for being inattentive. A second suffered back problems. A third was paralyzed by a stroke. A fourth ran into job problems. And a fifth had to undergo emergency surgery. The loss of a sixth juror, whose company folded, was averted when the judge arranged to have him put on the county payroll for the duration of the trial.

Pounders has ruminated lately about “the probability” of a mistrial, but stressed Thursday that the situation has not yet reached that stage, and that he sees no need to discuss various proposals to avert it so long as he has an intact, 12-member jury.

Advertisement

But he said if it becomes necessary, he “absolutely” would accept a stipulation by both sides to continue with fewer than 12 jurors, rather than declare a mistrial.

Deputy Dist. Atty. Lael Rubin was optimistic, with the trial estimated to last about two more months. “There’s no reason to panic. We’re not at that point yet. We still believe we’ll have 12 jurors to decide this case.”

Likewise, defense attorney Danny Davis, who represents Ray Buckey, said: “We’re simply not there. It’s premature. I’m going to do what I can to preserve all 13 (jurors) we have.” He noted that he had originally proposed selecting eight alternates. Rubin told the judge that the prosecution will propose Sept. 11 that both sides stipulate a willingness to finish the trial with 11 jurors, should another have to be released between now and the time the case goes to the jury in December.

Advertisement

Loss Is Looming

The loss of yet another juror, which would reduce the panel to 11, is looming for reasons that have been have been discussed in chambers and sealed by the judge. Either side may ask that the man be released “for cause”--said to be unrelated to job or health problems or the length of the proceedings. However, without divulging why either side might want him off the panel, Pounders said he has ultimate control and would be disinclined to find sufficient cause to remove the juror.

Defense attorney Dean Gits said he would “absolutely refuse to stipulate to less than 12,” explaining: “I selected a panel in anticipation that they would be serving collectively. . . . The more people we have the better chance we have of people airing their individual opinions and arriving at justice.”

Although 12-member juries in criminal cases are traditional, smaller juries sometimes hear cases in other states, including Florida, Massachussets and North Carolina. Under California case law, a mistrial is declared unless both sides agree to a reduced number.

‘Last Thing I Want’

Gits said his client, Peggy McMartin Buckey, just wants her six-year ordeal to end and has agreed to follow his advice--even if it means a mistrial and a resulting cloud of doubt hanging over her the rest of her life. “I think we’re winning, and the last thing I want is a mistrial,” Gits insisted Thursday, however.

Peggy Buckey and her son are charged with 65 counts of molestation and conspiracy involving 11 youngsters who attended their family-owned Manhattan Beach nursery school from 1978 through 1983.

Gits said--and the judge agreed--that it is theoretically possible to sever the case, continuing the trial of one defendant with a smaller jury and declaring a mistrial in the case of the other.

Advertisement

Asked whether the district attorney would refile the charges should a mistrial be declared, Rubin said her office would have to “evaluate” the situation--primarily the position of the alleged victims and their parents about giving up or enduring a second trial. The case has already cost county taxpayers more than $15 million over the last six years--the longest and costliest criminal proceeding in history.

Advertisement