Some Avoid TV Drama of O.C. Murder : Miniseries: For various reasons, a few of the people who were closest to the case on which the NBC dramatization ‘Love, Lies and Murder’ was based did not want to watch it.

NBC may have wooed millions of viewers around the country Sunday and Monday nights with its lavish production about Orange County murderer David Arnold Brown and the ultimate dysfunctional family, but some of those most familiar with the tale wanted nothing to do with it.

“I couldn’t watch it,” said Ethel Bailey, the 60-year-old mother of two of the main characters in “Love, Lies and Murder”--the murder victim and the sister who helped kill her. “I want to watch it later on tape, but right now it’s just too tough.

“Can anyone understand what it’s like to have a death in the family and then have it publicized all over the television and have to relive the whole thing again?,” the Victorville woman asked angrily. “All the wounds are reopened.”

The movie begins with the 1985 shooting death of Ethel Bailey’s daughter, Linda Brown, in her Garden Grove bed at the hands of Linda Brown’s 14-year-old stepdaughter, Cinnamon Brown. From there, it traces the discovery that the entire plot had been orchestrated by David Brown, the murder victim’s husband, with the aid of the victim’s own 17-year-old sister.

With a few strong exceptions, many of the family members, lawyers and law enforcement officials familiar with the Brown story gave the movie good marks for a reasonably fair presentation of the case. But Ethel Bailey wasn’t alone in shunning it altogether.

“I didn’t watch any of it,” said 71-year-old Arthur Brown of Carson, the father of David Brown and the man portrayed in the movie as having helped prod his granddaughter into revealing that she had not acted alone in the killing.

“It’s all just a bunch of bull as far as I’m concerned,” the elder Brown added. “I still love (David) and I believe he’s innocent. That’s all there is to it.”

David Brown’s older brother, Tom, didn’t watch the movie either--but for very different reasons.

Investigators said David Brown used Tom early in 1989 as an unwitting dupe in an effort to kill three key figures in his prosecution, and Tom said he wants to have nothing to do with the man or the case anymore.

“What am I gonna watch it for?” he asked. “I don’t really give a damn because as far as I know, I don’t have a brother anymore.”

Even Donald Rubright, an attorney involved in the case who had assisted in the filming of some court scenes, said: “To tell you the truth, I fell asleep and went to bed around 10 o’clock. . . . I think that when you know the case as well as a lot of the participants do, it starts to lose its flavor. It becomes time to move on.”

One person who watched the movie with a close eye was Ann Rule, a true-crime writer in Seattle who has scored best-sellers with past works on Ted Bundy and others. Her book on the Brown case is due early in May.

Rule, who found herself in a tense competition with NBC and the movie writers for access to participants in the murder scheme, insists that the hoopla over the movie will not threaten her own book.

“My book is not based on fact--it is fact,” she said after watching the first half of “Love, Lies and Murder” on Sunday night. “What this movie will do is spark interest and people will want to know the whole story because all television can do is take the top, the gloss.”

While the movie included some liberal embellishment of chronologies and dialogue, the main fault found by such critics as Rule and the prosecutor in the case, Orange County Deputy Dist. Atty. Jeoffrey Robinson, was in its portrayal of the victim’s sister.

The movie gives a generally sympathetic depiction of Patti Bailey, 17 at the time of the murder, as a manipulated teen-ager who was forced to have an affair with her brother-in-law and who then helped kill her sister.

But Rule and Robinson say the movie was slanted in Bailey’s favor since she was the scriptwriters’ main source. (In exchange for her cooperation, a substantial trust fund was set up for Bailey’s infant daughter, fathered by David Brown.)

Rule and Robinson maintain that Bailey was a willing participant, profiting from the murder when she married Brown and enjoying the upscale lifestyle afforded by the victim’s $835,000 in life insurance policies.

“Patti was treated as this martyr, a modern-day Joan of Arc,” said Robinson, who refused to cooperate with NBC on the project and instead worked with Rule on her book. “The bottom line is that’s not accurate. She had a very strong role in planning her sister’s murder.”