Health Net Gets New Contenders in HMO Bidding War
A bidding war broke out for California’s second-biggest HMO on Monday, as Health Net drew an unsolicited $200-million takeover bid from a Los Angeles investor group that eclipsed an offer of $108 million made earlier by top management.
Meanwhile, Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co., one of California’s largest life insurers, confirmed earlier Monday that it also is discussing a “cooperative venture” with Health Net. But Pacific Mutual, a Newport Beach-based insurer with $9.8 billion in assets, declined to specify whether it wants to buy all of Health Net, acquire a stake or merge some operations.
The $200-million bid came from Shamrock Investments, a 4-year-old firm that invests in and advises firms in the health-care field. It sent a letter to Health Net management offering $40 million in cash and a $160-million, 14-year note for the health-maintenance organization. Shamrock Investments is unrelated to Shamrock Holdings Co., a Burbank-based investment firm controlled by Roy Disney.
Spokesmen for Health Net and Pacific Mutual declined comment on Shamrock Investment’s announcement. Health Net, a Woodland Hills-based concern with 840,000 members, is second only to Oakland-based Kaiser Permanente among the state’s biggest health maintenance organizations.
Shamrock and Pacific Mutual were able to approach Health Net after a controversy over the organization’s financial worth stalled the management bid.
The management group, led by Health Net Chairman Roger F. Greaves, offered in March to acquire the HMO, which at the same time would convert from nonprofit to for-profit status. Under state law, the conversion and management’s buyout could occur provided Health Net donated an amount equivalent to its fair market value to a public charity--and provided the terms were approved by the state Department of Corporations.
(The conversion law is designed to compensate the public for the company’s tax-exempt status while it grew as a nonprofit entity.)
Health Net management proposed contributing $108 million over 15 years, including $15 million up front, to a newly formed public health foundation. The company said the amount was determined independently by the accounting firm Ernst & Young.
But Consumers Union, the publisher of Consumer Reports, and other critics complained that the amount vastly understated Health Net’s value. And as the criticism mounted last week, the Department of Corporations delayed its decision pending further review of the deal. The delay enabled Shamrock and Pacific Mutual to step forward.
In announcing its bid, Shamrock said “the public would be better served by the increased offer,” whose proceeds would likewise be donated to a charitable group. “Our desire is to work together with the board and management to assure fair value to the public,” Shamrock President Michael E. Gallagher said in his letter to Health Net.
One of Shamrock’s more visible moves came in 1989 when it joined takeover specialist Clayton & Dubilier to launch a nearly $2-billion offer for American Medical International Inc. The Beverly Hills-based hospital management firm was ultimately bought by a group that included Chicago’s wealthy Pritzker family and the investment firm First Boston Corp.
With Shamrock and Pacific Mutual involved, the Health Net situation is beginning to resemble a similar fight for a California HMO in 1985-86, when FHP International in Fountain Valley converted to for-profit status. In that case, FHP management offered a $38.6-million contribution to a charity to acquire the company, but another HMO, Maxicare Health Plans, offered $50 million.
However, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge ruled then that converting HMOs are not required to sell out to the highest bidder. So management got control.
Later in 1986, FHP’s management took FHP public with a stock offering, which promptly gave FHP a total market value of about $150 million--of which $114 million represented FHP stock still held by management.
More to Read
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.