Council Rejects City Manager’s Demand for Raise After Critical Job Evaluation
The Pasadena City Council has rejected City Manager Philip Hawkey’s demand for a pay raise.
Monday night’s request may not have been the best-timed, given that the council’s latest evaluation of Hawkey says he is little better than average and needs to shape up.
Negative comments about Hawkey far outnumbered the positive in a confidential quarterly performance evaluation obtained by The Times. While Hawkey is called a “smart, hard worker,” he is also “not a leader” and “not politically astute,” according to the report by five of the seven council members.
Hawkey, who throughout his five-year tenure has come under fire, got the results in December and discussed it privately last week with the council. On the report’s scale of 0 to 3, Hawkey scored a 1.8. “The majority of the City Council still supports Mr. Hawkey and that is the only evaluation that counts,” said Councilman Paul Little, who along with colleagues William E. Thomson, Ann-Maria Villicana and William Crowfoot supports Hawkey’s continued tenure.
But Vice Mayor Chris Holden says the city can ill afford a manager who fails to meet expectations. “In a city like Pasadena, you must have a first-class manager,” Holden said.
Hawkey, who obtained a two-year contract last summer, said the evaluation was skewed by council members who are upset with him and that the report fails to mention many of his successes. “I’m a very good city manager,” he said. “The city is better off now than five years ago.” . . .
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.