Perot Voters in State Courted for Buchanan
Volunteers in Patrick J. Buchanan’s presidential campaign on Sunday were soliciting members of Ross Perot’s Reform Party to re-register as Republicans--the first sign of serious on-the-ground campaigning in the California primary and the first firm evidence of cooperation between Perot and Buchanan forces.
About half of the Reform Party members being contacted expressed a willingness to change their registration so that they could support Buchanan with their votes in the state’s March 26 primary, said Penny Ferguson of San Mateo, Buchanan’s volunteer coordinator for San Mateo County.
“They’re very enthusiastic about Pat,” said Ferguson, who added that Reform Party officials volunteered to share their voter registration lists with the Buchanan campaign.
There was no indication of how many new voters the Buchanan campaign might pick up by today’s 5 p.m. registration deadline, but the move was considered a significant indication of a potential alliance between Perot and Buchanan, who have taken some similar positions and whose political bases of support overlap to a considerable degree.
Up to now, there has been virtually no visible campaign in California because the primary comes so late in the accelerated 1996 political season and running in so large a state entails immense cost and logistic problems.
For months, most campaign strategists had believed the GOP presidential contest would be settled by March 26. But the strength of Buchanan and others in the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire and Delaware primaries has cast doubt on that assumption.
State Republican Chairman John Herrington said Sunday, “California is shaping up more and more as being important.” But he added that it is too early to tell whether the primary will become pivotal in the selection of a Republican presidential nominee.
Within the past two weeks, the campaigns of Sen. Robert Dole of Kansas, Buchanan and former Tennessee Gov. Lamar Alexander have opened campaign offices with skeletal staffs in California. The western regional coordinator for publisher Steve Forbes works out of Sacramento.
As in many other states, Dole has the advantage of support from prominent political allies in California and access to their own political networks--particularly those of Gov. Pete Wilson and state Atty. Gen. Dan Lungren.
“From an organizational point of view, the Dole organization has a huge head start,” said Marty Wilson, a longtime Pete Wilson political strategist who has been appointed Dole’s campaign manager in California.
But that has not necessarily translated into voter enthusiasm for Dole in other states or in California. Dole received 36% of the votes in a California mail-in straw poll conducted in January and February and announced at the Republican State Convention on the eve of the Iowa caucuses.
But Buchanan ran a strong second with 25% and Forbes was third with 18%. Judging by their vocal support when the poll was announced, the number of Buchanan boosters among the 1,500 convention delegates appeared to be about on a par with the Dole camp.
California political experts have said they doubt Buchanan can defeat Dole here should the contest narrow to just those two by March 26, but they have indicated that he would be a significant force in a battle between three or four candidates.
Winning is everything in California, where Republicans still give the No. 1 vote-getter all 163 delegate votes, the largest bloc in the nation, representing 16% of the number of delegate votes needed to win the nomination.
Buchanan has several potential conservative constituencies in California in addition to Reform Party members: the National Rifle Assn. and other gun-owner groups, anti-abortion organizations, the Christian Coalition and those who have labored in initiative-petition campaigns against illegal immigration and affirmative action.
Many of those activists are members of the California Republican Assembly, a party-affiliated volunteer association of conservatives. For example, Buchanan supporter Ferguson is the president of the San Mateo CRA and a member of the state GOP executive committee.
The CRA has fewer than 10,000 members in California, but it is considered far more important strategically than its numbers suggest because members are willing to spend considerable time and money working for the causes they support. Ferguson was in Iowa for Buchanan for 2 1/2 weeks.
And while their numbers are not massive, Perot’s Reform Party officials have demonstrated an ability to organize. When Perot announced he was forming a new party last fall, California was the first target state for qualifying his group as a recognized political entity.
The Perot supporters managed to enlist nearly 100,000 new party members in a few weeks.
Herrington said the outcome of primaries and caucuses in 10 states on March 12, known as Super Tuesday, and the three big primaries in Illinois, Michigan and Ohio on March 19 will help determine the importance of the California primary.
More than 950 delegates will be selected in those contests.
If there still is a race, it could boil down to an intense one-week campaign in California, where the candidate who can best afford to blanket the airwaves with television commercials might have an overwhelming edge, Herrington and others said.
That could be Forbes, who is financing his campaign from his personal fortune and is not subject to federal campaign spending limits, including a California primary limit of about $2.2 million.
That is not much for a California campaign, where television time in the major markets is extremely expensive.
“The only reason it works,” said Leo J. Hindery of San Francisco, national finance co-chairman for Alexander, “is that it’s a very quick time frame.”
Sources have said Dole may be close to the national spending limit of $37 million by the middle of March, the result of his heavy outlays in an attempt to wrap up the nomination early in the process.
But if Buchanan continues to score well, he could come into California with the potential of raising considerable money from conservatives and have the support of an activist-fueled campaign organization.
Dole forces are attempting to pick up endorsements from supporters of Sen. Phil Gramm of Texas, who dropped out of the presidential contest after the New Hampshire primary. Until this month, Gramm was the only candidate who had built much of an organization in California.
“With Gramm out, our hope between now and the primary is that we will pick up his public endorsement and his activists,” Marty Wilson, the Dole campaign manager, said.
Wilson’s job is also to keep them from going to Buchanan. Many of Gramm’s supporters share Buchanan’s positions on a number of issues but went with Gramm out of the belief that Buchanan could not win the nomination.
Wilson said he did not know where Alexander’s California strength might lie.
“You need a lot of money to campaign out here,” he said. “Buchanan, on the other hand, he’ll appeal to red-meat conservative voters, and we certainly have a group of those in California as well.”
* WASHINGTON OUTLOOK: GOP race is forced to confront the economic anxiety issue. A5
More to Read
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.