Advertisement

Confronting Elder Abuse

Share via
Times Staff Writer

A lonely 80-year-old Huntington Beach woman is befriended by a charity volunteer, then quickly loses her home and money. The volunteer’s lifestyle soars.

A retired Los Angeles judge is gradually bilked of more than a million dollars in cash and belongings. Police are still looking for his housekeeper.

A 77-year-old Hollywood man marries a 36-year-old ex-convict and five months later is dead of starvation. Charged with murder, she pleads guilty to involuntary manslaughter and forgery and is sent to prison.

Advertisement

People 65 and older are the wealthiest and fastest-growing group of Americans, and they are being swindled at such an alarming rate that one investigator termed it “open season on the elderly.”

Many housekeepers, nurses, neighbors and friends can’t resist the easy pickings. Most often, however, it’s the elder’s own family members who do the damage, rationalizing that if they’re going to inherit Grandma’s money someday, they might as well start spending it now.

Some even resort to a subtle form of murder--withholding food or medication until the elder dies a seemingly natural death. It is “the easiest way to cover the crime,” said one investigator.

Advertisement

More than 800 cases of “fiduciary elder abuse” were reported in Orange County last year and more than 1,000 in Los Angeles County, but authorities say many go unnoticed.

The state attorney general’s office estimates only one in 14 instances is reported. A quarter-million elders are bilked each year, according to estimates by the National Committee for the Prevention of Elder Abuse.

Even reported cases can easily fall through the cracks. Most police are not trained to recognize this subtle crime. The state Legislature has set a 1999 deadline for training all California police officers.

Advertisement

Before the Legislature are a long list of bills intended to make prosecution easier.

And an idea born in Los Angeles--the Fiduciary Abuse Specialist Team (FAST) of legal, financial and other experts to train and advise police and social workers--is spreading. Orange, San Diego and San Luis Obispo counties have versions. Ventura and Kern counties are considering creation of similar teams.

Orange County’s is in its infancy, but it has trained some local police investigators and has formed a network of experts to advise them.

“I think it will work the same way it worked for domestic violence cases,” says Jane L. Shade, head of the Orange County district attorney’s family violence unit.

“There was a huge turnaround with those cases--prosecuting cases that before wouldn’t have gone anywhere.”

Even so, prosecution remains unusually difficult, says Ardith Javan, chief of the Los Angeles County district attorney’s elder abuse section.

The great majority of victims are too addled to testify in court, and sometimes they even side with the victimizer, Javan says. Sometimes jurors don’t regard the case as a serious crime, or even a crime at all.

Advertisement

In reality, says Newport Beach psychiatrist Bennett Blum, it’s a matter of life and death for elders. Taking their money often means sentencing them to a rapid decline and an early death.

If Grandma lets Grandson use her credit card or Grandma lovingly signs over her stock for his birthday, how can that be a crime?

The distinction turns on the elder’s mental state, says Dave Harned, one of two Los Angeles police detectives who specialize in elder fraud.

Is the elder’s mind sharp enough to make sound financial decisions? That is, can the elder foresee the consequences?

“We have to show that there was a taking and the person who did the taking should have known the elder had a mental impairment,” Harned says. The impairment makes the elder’s willingness legally irrelevant.

The investigator’s problem is that, at first, victimizers behave no differently than those genuinely helping an elder. That is, they take over the elder’s life.

Advertisement

In both cases, they offer help, then usually obtain access to the elder’s bank accounts, credit cards and stock. They become joint or sole owners of the elder’s home and other property. They may have Grandma sign a power of attorney, granting authority over all her financial and personal affairs.

*

Yet warning signs appear, according to Chayo Reyes, Harned’s partner and supervisor of LAPD’s Elder Persons Estate Unit.

Victimizers “isolate the elder,” Reyes says. “And once they get legal access, they use the documents like they’re a license to steal.”

They may use Grandma’s money to buy themselves an expensive car, rationalizing that they need it to take her to the doctor. They may decide Grandma needs a vacation and take a trip to Las Vegas, where Grandma passes the time in a hotel room.

Worse yet, they may sell Grandma’s house and pocket the money--or mortgage it and let it go into foreclosure. Either way, Grandma has lost her haven.

Reyes says the predator is usually someone new on the scene--a stranger, an acquaintance, a family member who before spent little or no time with Grandma. Typically, this newcomer’s personal finances are shaky.

Advertisement

Soon the newcomer’s financial situation dramatically improves, while Grandma’s bank balance declines. This, says Reyes, is the onset of financial ruin for the elder. “If law enforcement doesn’t intervene quickly, the elder can lose everything.”

“We’re not talking about a person that’s so demented they just lie in bed and don’t recognize people,” says psychiatrist Blum.

“We’re talking about the person whose ability to quickly grasp concepts and think strategically is impaired even slightly. This person can be manipulated, even if their memory is intact. If there’s a slight memory impairment, it makes manipulation all that easier.”

Intelligence and sophistication of the elder don’t seem to matter in such cases, Blum says. “I’ve worked on several cases where the victim was mentally intact, physically healthy, intelligent--retired CEOs and retired university professors.

“They marry women two to five decades younger than themselves. They’ll admit to their families and investigators, ‘I know she just wants my money, but that’s better than being alone.’

“What they don’t realize is that when the money’s gone, so is the perpetrator. I’ve seen it happen in less than a month--a couple of weeks, even.”

Advertisement

Criminals have discovered that stealing from elders is easy and relatively safe, Reyes says. Some learn about it in prison, he adds.

“There’s the cons who come out of the joint and become care providers. Believe me, they’re doing it. We had one who starved a person to death and inherited $1.5 million.”

Or they go to a place where they can strike up a conversation with a well-heeled and lonely elder--church, the supermarket, a bus stop and, especially, a bank.

“Usually the perpetrator’s approach is very subtle,” Reyes says. “They’ll ask for directions and, you know, ‘Can you show me where that is?’ They’ll use that as an excuse to take them out to lunch or send them a bowl of fruit out of gratitude.”

“A lot will use children as props,” Harned says. “The kid will say, ‘Oh, you’re so nice, you remind me of my grandfather. In fact, you’re nicer than my grandfather.’

“They take him to Disneyland. They visit him. They take a lonely man and bring him into their family unit.”

Advertisement

Soon there’s news of a “crisis” in the perpetrator’s family, one that only money can solve. They’re going to lose their house or business. The child needs a critical operation. Could they borrow $50,000? The elder feels obligated.

“After he turns over the money, he never sees them again,” Harned says.

Still, all agree the more common predator is the opportunist--an acquaintance, a neighbor or family member who can’t resist temptation or doesn’t even try.

“I do believe that with some of the perpetrators, there are times when they actually think they’re doing the best they can and it’s OK,” says Rebecca Guider of Orange County’s Adult Protective Services.

“They believe they’re entitled to the money. It’s going to be theirs when Mom’s gone anyway, and they’re just using it now. It’s amazing how people’s principles, if they had any, can be compromised once money becomes a factor.”

But Reyes says it’s not hard to see through such rationalization. It comes down to where the money’s going, he says. Is it being spent on the elder or is it feathering the relative’s nest? “It’s not that hard a call.”

Whether perpetrated by strangers, friends or relatives, the crimes usually follow a pattern, Blum says.

Advertisement

The elder is befriended, then isolated. Mail and telephone calls are intercepted, and neighbors, friends and family are told the elder doesn’t want to see them.

A sort of brainwashing begins. The predator panders to the elder’s fears, usually of being sent to a rest home, and portrays him or herself as the elder’s only true friend.

Finally, the predator gains access to the elder’s bank accounts and real estate. Sometimes the documents are forged, but most often the elder signs willingly.

“This whole pattern is basically what cults do to their victims,” Blum says. “It’s the formation of a mini-cult.”

*

This pattern was officially acknowledged as a crime in 1986, when the state penal code was amended to impose stiffer-than-usual penalties for caretakers and others “in a position of trust” who steal from or defraud someone age 65 or older.

The following year, LAPD became the first to assign a detective solely to fiduciary elder abuse.

Advertisement

More than a decade later, California law enforcement as a whole remains “grotesquely undertrained and understaffed” to deal with this often subtle crime, says Blum, a member of both Los Angeles and Orange County FAST.

In 1993, Los Angeles was first to create a FAST task force of volunteer experts to advise and train social workers and police. Without such training, they are likely to overlook the cases they encounter, Harned says.

Even if they recognize it, says Harned, they may blow the investigation by using standard police interview techniques.

“The suspect has basically brainwashed the senior. Possibly there’s intimidation. Possibly the senior would rather have the suspect involved in his life than no one at all.

“What happens is that if you just ask the senior whether he’s being ripped off, he usually denies it.”

Reyes and Harned teach investigators to conduct a leisurely, low-key interview that approaches the subject slowly and obliquely.

Advertisement

You try to build a case, but “prosecution isn’t necessarily what you want to do,” says Huntington Beach Police Det. David A. Goss, an elder-fraud specialist.

“It’s one of the options, but most important is getting control back, returning assets, reestablishing the quality of life for the elder. We’re not doing the traditional things cops do, but maybe we save the victim.”

(BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX / INFOGRAPHIC)

Pending State Legislation Affecting Elder Abuse

Senate Bills

* SB1715 (by Charles M. Calderon, D-Whittier)--Would create a new crime, willful isolation (false imprisonment) of an elder. Would cut abusers out of victim’s will. Would require people involved in financial, governmental, charitable and religious organizations to report cases of suspected elder financial abuse they encounter. (Referred to appropriations committee.)

* SB1780 (by Steve Peace, D-El Cajon)--Prohibits deceptive contest mailings whose envelopes state or imply that the recipient has won a prize. Supporters say elders are the most frequent victims of such scams. (Passed out of appropriations committee and awaiting vote by the Senate.)

* SB1808 (by Teresa Hughes, D-Inglewood)--Would mandate a five-year pilot program for elder-abuse prevention, protection and education. (Referred to health and human services committee.)

* SB1810 (by Hughes)--Would require the state Department of Social Services to make elder abuse one of its highest priorities. Would require the department to enlist support for a comprehensive program, including 24-hour emergency shelters for victims. (Referred to health and human services committee.)

Advertisement

* SB1868 (by Hughes)--Would allow police investigators who believe a person is unable to manage financial affairs and is about to be defrauded to serve notice on financial institutions and escrow companies to freeze transactions for at least 30 days. (Referred to appropriations committee.)

* SB2199 (by Bill Lockyer, D-Hayward)--Among other actions, would expand current mandatory reporting of suspected physical abuse of elders to including reporting of abandonment, isolation, financial abuse and neglect. (Referred to appropriations committee.)

Assembly Bills

* AB190 (by Grace Napolitano, D-Norwalk)--Extends the statute of limitations on theft or embezzlement against elders. (Passed Assembly, referred to Senate public safety committee.)

* AB880 (by Bob Hertzberg, D-Sherman Oaks)--Would broaden existing law to prohibit anyone, not just people “in a position of trust,” from committing theft or embezzlement against an elder. Would provide stiffer sentences for attempted murder of an elder. (Passed Assembly, referred to Senate public safety committee.)

* AB1440 (by Tom Woods, R-Shasta, and Hertzberg)--Would require caregivers employed under the state In-Home Supportive Services program to submit fingerprints for criminal background checks. (Passed Assembly, referred to Senate public safety committee.)

* AB1716 (by Kevin Murray, D-Los Angeles)--Would prohibit any lawyer from selling financial products to an elder. Would prohibit lawyers from being paid for referrals to financial organizations that sell to lawyer’s clients. (Approved by judiciary committee and awaiting vote by Assembly.)

Advertisement

* AB2419 (by Woods)--Would require caregivers employed by public social services to undergo criminal background check. Would establish a central database of such checks and make them available to social service agencies and employers. (Referred to public safety committee.)

More Information

California Legislative Counsel on the Internet at https://www.leginfo.ca.gov

Source: California Legislative Counsel

ELDER POPULATION

* Americans 65 and older, the fastest growing segment of the population, are expected to top 35 million by 2000.

* Americans 100 and older will top 1 million by 2050.

* Elders, about 13% of the population, own more than half of all savings and 75% of all personal property. Individual assets average $29,000, but there is wide disparity.

* U.S. Census estimates for 65 and older:

Los Angeles County--916,106

San Diego County--310,904

Orange County--250,125

Riverside County--191,127

San Bernardino County--146,386

Ventura County--70,078

Kern County--61,702

Santa Barbara County--49,845

San Luis Obispo County--34,708

FINANCIAL ABUSE WARNING SIGNS

* A new friend spending lots of time with elder.

* A relative, previously inattentive, now spending time or moving in with elder.

* Elder promised lifelong care in exchange for money or property.

* Big changes in banking activity, such as:

Large withdrawals.

Certificate of deposit cash-outs with penalties.

Automated teller withdrawals when elder is disabled.

A new credit card.

Transfer of accounts.

A new name on accounts.

A change in beneficiary.

* A new will or power of attorney when elder is clearly incapable.

* A recent change in title to elder’s home in favor of new friend.

* Missing personal belongings, such as art, silver and jewelry.

* Caregiver asks only financial questions about elder.

* Caregiver seems to have no means of support.

* Caregiver tries to isolate or intimidate elder.

FINANCIAL ABUSE OF ELDERS

* Studies estimate that at least 1 million American elders have been financially exploited by their own families or close friends.

* If fraud by strangers and newcomers is included, about one in 20 elders has been victimized. But only about one in 14 instances is reported.

* Reports of all elder abuse reached 293,000 in 1996, a 10-year increase of 150%. About a quarter of cases involve fraud or theft.

Advertisement

* The typical victim:

--Lives alone.

--Is socially isolated.

--Has physical or mental disabilities.

--Fears being removed from home.

--Does not report the victimizer.

--Lies to protect the victimizer.

--Is shattered by self-reproach and self-doubt for being gullible.

* The typical perpetrator:

--Is a family member or caregiver.

--Has no criminal record.

--Is an opportunist with only one victim.

--Provides only minimal support for the victim.

FIGHTING FINANCIAL ABUSE

If you’re suspicious:

* Inform the elder’s bankers and brokers of your suspicions. (Doing so in good faith protects you from liability under state law.)

* Inform county Adult Protective Services in elder’s county of residence.

MORE INFORMATION

Orange County Adult Protective Services: (714) 566-3116

Orange County Council on Aging: (714) 863-0323

National Center on Elder Abuse: https://www.gwjapan.com/NCEA

National Aging Information Center: https://www.aoa.dhhs.gov/naic

Federal Administration on Aging: https://www.aoa.dhhs.gov

Advertisement