Death Penalty Decision
Re “ Furrow Faces Federal Hate Crime Charges,” Dec. 3.
If ever there were a better time for the U.S. and state governments to show that they are serious about prosecuting hate crimes, violent crimes and weapons violations, I have not heard of one.
The U.S. attorney’s office is reported by The Times as having not decided whether to pursue the death penalty, and that no decision will be made before February. Why not a decision to do so right now, with trial to commence tomorrow? Is not this a prime opportunity to show future Buford Furrows that this type of behavior will be dealt with swiftly, seriously and aggressively, with the ultimate penalty to be paid?
Delays in decision-making regarding whether to seek the death penalty give individuals, such as members of the Aryan Nations, increased credibility among their followers. Seeking the death penalty immediately and consistently will send a strong message that anyone who engages in this type of behavior will be subject to execution. Period.
Two of the purposes of punishment are general and specific deterrence. Seeking the death penalty in cases like this one will achieve both. Anything less will lead to further acts of violence in the name of race superiority.
MICHAEL J. ALLEGRETTI
Northridge
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
