Wells Fargo’s Actions Are Inconsistent
- Share via
Here is another example of questionable practices by Wells Fargo Bank (“Wells Fargo Facing Tough Criticism,” March 2):
My company had a line of credit with Wells Fargo. About a year-and-a-half ago the balance stood at roughly $40,000. I had been paying the interest, plus a principal payment, monthly. When the annual fee of $150 came due, my statement said the minimum payment due was the interest plus the $150.
I called, as I had for several years, and asked to have the annual fee waived. As they always did, the fee was waived. That particular month I decided to make an interest-only payment and mailed in the payment less the $150 that had been waived.
Shortly afterward, I wrote a check against the business line for $6,000 and deposited it into my Wells Fargo checking account. I had the credit available.
Imagine my surprise when the $6,000 check bounced, along with several other checks I had written against that $6,000.
When I called to find out why this happened, I was told that because I didn’t pay the minimum payment due (interest plus the annual fee) a hold was placed on my account allowing no new activity. I explained the $150 had been waived.
They acknowledged that fact but, according to the terms of my loan, I had to pay the minimum payment shown on the statement. The $150 would show on my next statement as a credit item.
In addition, I now had a late-payment fee of $35 on my account. The only way I could get my account off hold status was to pay the (waived) annual fee and the $35, even though the $150 had already been credited to my account.
How stupid is that? The whole point of having the fee waived was so I wouldn’t have to pay it in the first place. I paid it, though, because I had to get that $6,000 back into my regular checking account to make good with my vendors.
Since then, I got another line of credit with another bank (with no annual fee and a lower interest rate) and paid off the Wells Fargo account.
The kicker is now that I don’t owe them any money, they are all over me to get my business back with special offers, lower rates and a more generous line of credit.
Too bad they weren’t that nice when they did have my business.
Peggy Ziegler
Pomona
More to Read
Inside the business of entertainment
The Wide Shot brings you news, analysis and insights on everything from streaming wars to production — and what it all means for the future.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.