Advertisement

Driven to distraction

Share via

Re “$3.2 million for legislators’ cars,” June 16

I think a state-provided vehicle is a reasonable allowance that can help a legislator do his or her job effectively.

But, as a California taxpayer, I do not like paying for luxury vehicles when basic transportation will do. Particularly galling is Sen. Ron Calderon’s (D-Montebello) decision to bill us nearly $40,000 for a Cadillac.

Calderon’s comment in your story is both evasive and unctuous: “If there is a decision to disallow the use of vehicles in the district, I would happily surrender the vehicle I now drive in commonality with the sacrifices others are making in these difficult economic times.”

Advertisement

Please. If Calderon is that concerned, then why is he charging us, even partly, for a car that is apparently more expensive than any other vehicle chosen by any other legislator?

Tom Henson

Irvine

::

So California has the highest-paid and, to me, lowest-performing state legislators.

Do we really need these full-time, perk-expecting lawmakers? Perhaps Fiat can take over our state government.

Vickie Hamilton

Huntington Beach

::

It is unconscionable for legislators to drive state-owned cars when we are all faced with rising taxes.

Advertisement

This is obviously a benefit they voted for themselves.

Although Sen. Tony Strickland (R-Thousand Oaks) states he chooses to use his personal car, his wife, Assemblywoman Audra Strickland, has a state car.

Jere Robings

Thousand Oaks

Advertisement