Advertisement
Veronique de Rugy

Americans are sick of federal waste. Republicans should take the hint

President Clinton points to a chart showing decline in deficit.
President Clinton in 1995 showing the decline in deficit spending during his first term. Fewer and fewer Americans can remember a time of balanced budgets: The last year without a deficit was 2001.
(Chuck Kennedy / AFP via Getty Images)

The federal budget remains a disaster, and for all the splashy talk of cost-cutting and tariff-driven revenue, Americans know it. Especially galling is that the latest fiscal wreckage is being overseen by an administration that promised business acumen and conservative restraint. Republicans are delivering the opposite: a self-inflicted destruction of wealth, rising interest rates, creeping inflation fears and an abandonment of even their usual pretense of fiscal discipline.

The Cato Institute’s new national fiscal policy survey results confirm that Americans don’t trust politicians to manage our money. Seventy-six percent say the federal government spends too much. An astonishing 85% say the past decade’s spending spree has either had no impact on their quality of life or made it worse.

That’s a damning indictment of the stunning deficits of the first Trump administration, unhinged Biden administration spending and Republicans who, until very recently, at least pretended to care about fiscal sanity, including being realistic about the need to reform entitlement programs.

Ninety-eight percent of Americans believe there’s at least some waste, fraud and abuse in federal spending, and two-thirds think that there’s a lot. The public now estimates that 59 cents of every federal dollar is wasted — the highest amount recorded since Gallup began asking that question in 1979.

Advertisement

This isn’t the view of a crank minority: Eighty-nine percent of Americans, including 99% of Republicans, support a full audit of federal spending.

You’d think that would be a wake-up call, especially when the debt picture is deteriorating so rapidly. According to the Treasury Department, as of this month — only halfway through the fiscal year — we’ve already posted a deficit of $1.3 trillion. Interest payments alone crossed the $500-billion mark, crowding out almost everything else. So much for the “low interest rates forever” fantasy.

About those high interest rates: One of the more absurd economic notions floated by the Trump administration is that tariffs, by rattling markets as they did last week, would help. Supposedly, panicked investors would flee to U.S. Treasuries, driving down interest rates and enabling cheaper refinancing of the debt. That was the theory, anyway, until markets crashed so badly that investors started dumping bonds and rates rose.

The key issue is what financial columnist Jon Sindreu described as the administration “upending the global trading system.” Instead of making government debt safer, it made investors wary of holding U.S. financial assets. The yield on 10-year Treasury bonds has since gone up, not down.

That’s especially troubling given that roughly one-third of government debt matures in under a year. Protectionist policy has collided with budgetary recklessness, and the coming refinancing will bring an expensive tab instead of relief. We’ll pay more to borrow than ever before.

Let’s not forget inflation. Speaking at a business journalism conference, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell stated that Trump’s tariffs were “significantly larger than expected” and their economic effects — including higher inflation and slower growth — are likely to be similarly substantial. Fighting inflation will require raising interest rates, which again will raise interest payments and the deficit.

Advertisement

On top of that, Republicans are preparing to extend the Trump tax cuts. There are reasonable ways to do it, but they seem poised to tack on new cuts, some more politically motivated than economically sound. This comes without the necessary spending cuts or structural reforms to offset lost revenue. The result? A ballooning deficit, a shrinking revenue base and no long-term plan. This isn’t supply-side economics. It’s magical thinking.

OK, but what if tariffs raise trillions in revenue, as administration officials have bragged? That’s not a win.

No, it’s just another way of saying they’ve levied the largest tax increase in U.S. history on American consumers. And it’s certainly not what voters had in mind when they heard “America First.” We shouldn’t count on this revenue, if it ever materializes, to lower debt relative to GDP. Fiscal adjustments based on higher taxes usually don’t. They do, however, slow the economy in the short and long term.

And what about DOGE, the so-called Department of Government Efficiency? Well, apparently Elon Musk and his team will cut $150 billion, not the “at least” $2 trillion once promised. I’m grateful they’re cutting some spending, but let’s face it, it’s a drop in the bucket of red ink.

Republicans cannot keep sleepwalking into the same fiscal mistakes Democrats made by trading long-term stability for short-term political gain, blowing up the budget for convenience and hoping voters don’t notice. Because voters are noticing.

They know Washington wastes their money. They know budget deficits matter. And they’re desperate for someone — anyone — to act like a responsible adult. The question is whether Republicans, who still have a mandate for change, will answer the call.

Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. This article was produced in collaboration with Creators Syndicate.

Insights

L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.

Viewpoint
This article generally aligns with a Center Right point of view. Learn more about this AI-generated analysis

Perspectives

The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.

Ideas expressed in the piece

  • Public distrust in federal spending is at an all-time high, with 76% of Americans believing the government spends too much and 85% reporting that increased spending over the past decade has either reduced or had no impact on their quality of life[1][6]. This sentiment is driven by perceptions that 59 cents of every federal dollar is wasted, the highest level recorded since 1979[1][6].
  • Calls for accountability are widespread, as 89% of Americans support a full audit of federal spending to root out waste, fraud, and abuse. This includes overwhelming majorities across party lines, with 99% of Republicans, 89% of independents, and 83% of Democrats backing such measures[1][6].
  • Criticism of fiscal policies centers on the administration’s reliance on tariffs and tax cuts without corresponding spending reforms. The article argues these policies have exacerbated deficits, raised interest rates, and failed to address structural issues like entitlement programs. It also dismisses the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) as insufficient, noting its $150 billion in cuts fall short of the promised $2 trillion[1][4][6].

Different views on the topic

  • Administration efforts to cut waste are highlighted in executive orders targeting bureaucratic inefficiency, including the elimination of redundant federal entities and advisory committees. The DOGE has reportedly identified billions in savings, with initiatives like shared services and procurement reforms aimed at streamlining operations[2][5].
  • Support for fiscal restraint is evident in polling showing 62% of Americans favor reducing the federal workforce to cut spending, and 78% believe spending reductions would help or have no negative economic impact. Additionally, 60% prioritize auditing existing spending over raising taxes to address deficits[1][6][4].
  • Advocacy for growth-oriented policies emphasizes extending tax cuts paired with spending reforms. Polls reveal 63% support making the 2017 tax cuts permanent if matched with cuts, and 66% oppose raising corporate taxes, arguing lower rates incentivize investment and job creation[4][6]. Critics of the article’s stance contend that gradual reforms, such as DOGE’s audits and targeted program eliminations, are pragmatic steps toward long-term fiscal stability[2][3][5].

Advertisement