Former Trump officials, including Hope Hicks, subpoenaed by House Judiciary chairman
- Share via
The Democratic chairman of the House Judiciary Committee issued subpoenas Tuesday ordering two more of President Trump’s former advisors — Hope Hicks and Annie Donaldson — to testify before the panel and hand over documents.
Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York wants Hicks, the former White House communications director, and Donaldson, who was deputy to former White House Counsel Donald McGahn, to undergo questioning in his panel’s efforts to pursue findings by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III concerning possible obstruction of justice by Trump.
“I have issued these subpoenas today to two critical witnesses who have worked closely with the president,” Nadler said in a statement. “We are seeking the information in order to conduct proper oversight, consider potential legislation and perform our constitutional duties.”
The aggressive move by Nadler came just hours after McGahn defied a committee subpoena for his testimony, refusing to attend a scheduled Judiciary hearing at the direction of the White House.
Nadler said after McGahn’s failure to show up that his committee will fight the White House’s assertion of immunity and obtain McGahn’s testimony, “even if we have to go to court to secure it.”
Hicks, who was subpoenaed to testify on June 24, had been one of Trump’s longest-serving and most trusted advisors. She left the White House last year and is now chief communications officer for Fox Corp., owner of Trump’s favorite cable news channel.
As McGahn’s chief of staff, Donaldson had a close-up view of how the attorney handled Trump’s demands and any alleged misconduct. Her notes are cited extensively in Mueller’s report.
McGahn had been the first former White House employee to receive a subpoena for congressional testimony since the public release of Mueller’s redacted report.
But Trump since has declared that his administration will fight “all the subpoenas.”
In addition to Nadler’s latest subpoenas, which were authorized by the Judiciary Committee on April 3, other potential legal showdowns loom in his committee’s investigation of Trump, his finances and whether he tried to obstruct justice.
More to Read
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.