COSTA MESA CITY COUNCIL WRAP-UP
-- Compiled by Lolita Harper
Here are some of the decisions made at Monday’s Costa Mesa City
Council meeting.
U-HAUL STORAGE
WHAT HAPPENED: The City Council denied a request from a local business
owner to store U-Haul rentals on his Newport Boulevard property.
Eugene Chan, the owner of a small storage facility, presented his case
-- for the third time -- to store up to six trucks on his property,
saying it would be more convenient for his customers to be able to load
and park their cars at the storage facility. Chan reduced the number to
four U-Haul trucks because of space concerns.
His concession, however, did not sway three council members and his
request was narrowly denied -- an action that was met by boos from a
spirited council audience.
On Oct. 15, council members upheld the Planning Commission’s decision
to deny Chan a permit to store six trucks at his storage facility at 2458
Newport Blvd. Council members said the large rental trucks were not
appropriate for the site, which runs along an alley. Councilwoman Karen
Robinson was concerned about room for emergency vehicles if up to six
trucks were parked behind the storage units.
Chan was not at the Oct. 15 City Council meeting because he said he
was misinformed about the starting time, so he was granted a rehearing by
the council so he could be present.
During his rehearing Monday, photographs of his business were shown,
sparking Councilwoman Libby Cowan to question if his sign was legal.
Councilman Gary Monahan reminded the council how hard it was to
develop that area of Newport Boulevard until Chan devised a workable
solution to develop the land.
WHAT IT MEANS: Chan will not be allowed to store any U-Haul vehicles
on his property.
VOTE: 3 to 2 to deny his request.
WHAT WAS SAID: Monahan, who owns a local restaurant and bar,
sympathized with Chan, saying he understood that customer convenience was
essential to an increase in business.
“If I don’t have hamburgers on my menu and my customers ask me for
hamburgers, I’m going to do my best to give them what they want,” he
said.
JIM’S TOWING
WHAT HAPPENED: Council members unanimously upheld the Planning
Commission’s decision to allow Jim’s Towing to add an impound yard, but
they added a few more conditions to ensure compatibility with neighbors.
The council allowed what was described as a “glorified parking lot” as
long as no structures were built, the additional land was landscaped to
match the rest of the property and that the owners of Jim’s Towing work
with staff to explore using pervious concrete for the resurfacing of the
parking lot.
This is the second time a city official has questioned the approval of
the additional lot at Jim’s Towing on 18th Street.
In August, the city zoning staff approved an additional vehicle
storage lot at 917 W. 18th St. Planning Commissioner Eleanor Egan
appealed the decision and took it to the Planning Commission for a vote.
The lot was narrowly approved by the commission, with Egan and the
commission’s chairwoman, Katrina Foley, voting against it.
Dixon said she is concerned with the neighbors in nearby homes and
what she calls an inconsistency with the council’s intent to revitalize
the Westside. She also said an auto storage lot is not a desirable use
for the land and thought it might depress land value in the area.
James Lewis, the owner of Jim’s Towing, said the storage area is
intended for long-term vehicle storage. He estimated that two or three
vehicles may need to be picked up at night, in response to calls from the
California Highway Patrol, but most business would take place during the
day.
A staff report stated that redevelopment of the Westside would be more
easily accomplished if there were no buildings on the land. Therefore, a
storage lot, and the subsequent rezone, would be preferred.
WHAT IT MEANS: A new impound yard will be built at Jim’s Towing,
holding about 50 cars for long-term storage.
VOTE: 5-0 to allow the impound yard.
WHAT WAS SAID: Councilman Gary Monahan wanted to ensure that
additional nighttime activity was not a problem and asked Lewis to
abandon any impound from the highway patrol, saying it was a minimal
portion of his business anyway.
Lewis refused saying:
“Business is business. In these uncertain times I can’t afford to give
up anything.”
VICTORIA STREET PARKING
WHAT HAPPENED: Council members allowed a reduction in parking at a
commercial complex on Victoria Street, saying the shape of the lot was
too unusual to accommodate the required amount.
Councilwoman Karen Robinson asked the council to review a change that
was granted by the Planning Commission for parking requirements at 248
Victoria St. In her appeal, Robinson said the variance lacked factual
basis.
The property was formerly a 10-unit apartment building that was cited
for substandard housing conditions and ultimately abandoned. The owners,
South Coast R.E. Investments, bought the land with the intention of
improving the apartment building. However, city codes did not allow for
residential use on the property, so the builder submitted plans to
convert the building into a commercial use.
To run a business out of the building, the owner was confronted with
citywide minimum parking space requirements. Because of the odd shape of
the lot -- a deep and rectangular space -- the required 24 spaces are
impossible to build, the owner said.
The applicant applied to build 16 spaces and an additional three
compact spaces.
WHAT IT MEANS: South Coast R.E. Investments will be allowed to offer
fewer parking spaces as long as the company reduces the number of tenants
from 10 to eight, posts signs prohibiting backing out of the driveway and
restricts parking in the rear of the lot to allow for enough room to turn
around and drive out facing front.
VOTE: 5-0 to allow the reduction in parking spaces.
WHAT WAS SAID: “My main concern is safety,” Mayor Linda Dixon said. “I
don’t want people to back out of that driveway onto Victoria Avenue.”
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
WHAT HAPPENED: Councilman Chris Steel’s appeal of the Planning
Commission’s decision to approve affordable housing on Pomona Avenue was
postponed to the Jan. 22 meeting.
The apartments at 1925 Pomona Ave. are owned by Habitat for Humanity.
The organization has requested a conversion of the apartments to
ownership condominiums, which would be sold to Habitat for Humanity
clients as affordable housing. Plans for the site also include more open
space and parkway landscape.
The Planning Division and the city attorney are working on a response
to Steel’s appeal and have requested the hearing be delayed.
WHAT IT MEANS: Once city staff has the time to review and respond to
Steel’s appeal, the item will be brought back to the council’s attention,
at which time the public may comment on it.
VOTE: 5-0 to continue the item.
NEXT MEETING
* WHAT: Costa Mesa City Council meeting
* WHEN: 6:30 p.m. Jan. 22
* WHERE: Costa Mesa City Hall, 77 Fair Drive
* INFORMATION: (714) 754-5221
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.