Assessor’s actions may cost schools
Deirdre Newman
NEWPORT-MESA -- A letter released Tuesday by the county auditor shows
the school district could endure a staggering loss of about $11.5 million
this year if an initial ruling on property tax assessments turns into a
class-action lawsuit.
Assistant Supt. Mike Fine of the Newport-Mesa Unified School District
was quick to downplay the loss because he expects the effect to be
considerably less -- about $4 million -- and a successful appeal could do
away with it altogether.
“The first thing is, we don’t know it means anything because we don’t
know the ruling is valid,” Fine said. “This is a huge issue for the
state, not just for schools, and it needs to rise to a higher, more
competent level.”
The estimates, released by county Auditor-Controller David Sundstrom,
show the district would also lose about $5.9 million in subsequent years.
Cities would also suffer, with Newport Beach anticipating to lose $3.4
million the first year and $1.7 million in subsequent years. Costa Mesa
would be hammered with an estimated $1.5-million loss the first year and
$780,000 in subsequent years.
The losses are based on a Superior Court judge’s recent decision that
the county assessor violated Proposition 13 by a process known as
recapturing. It increases property assessments above the legal 2% a year
mandated by Proposition 13 to compensate for a property decreasing in
value and then rebounding. It has been a common practice among many
counties around the state in recent years.
Officials close to the case expect Judge John Watson to decide whether
to expand the ruling to class-action status next week. On Jan. 7, the
Orange County Board of Supervisors directed the county counsel not to
appeal the case.
Sundstrom, however, claims in his letter that “there is a reasonable
expectation that the judge’s order would be reversed on appeal.”
The recapturing process began when Bob Pool and Renee Bezaire, a Seal
Beach couple, filed suit when their home’s assessed value reached 4% in
1998.
In December, Watson declared the practice unconstitutional, saying
property values cannot be increased by more than 2% a year, even if the
market exceeds that amount.
The couple’s taxes have since been adjusted, and they have received
their refund. But if the ruling turns class-action, the county will be
forced to refund about $285 million in excess property taxes paid between
1998 and April 2002.
Schools would be hardest hit because they rely so heavily on property
taxes. But the estimated $11.5-million loss to the Newport-Mesa district
translates into a $4-million loss because the state is legally required
to pay the difference, Fine said.
The district has $4 million in reserve, Fine said, and would not have
to resort to layoffs this school year. Next year, however, would be
different, as the district must deal with the state budget deficit, as
well as losing about $6 million more in recapturing.
Fine said the district is exploring its legal options.
“We’re looking at a number of different legal theories to protect
ourselves from uninformed decisions the county has made,” Fine said. “One
of the questions is if the county screwed up, why aren’t they making it
whole? Take it out of the assessor’s paycheck, not out of ours.”
Newport Beach officials said the first potential $3-million hit would
be devastating.
“If the city had to refund all $3 million at once, that would have a
huge effect on the city’s operating budget,” said Dennis Danner,
administrative services director for the city.
All the secured property tax goes to the city’s general fund, which
pays for most of the city services, including public safety, recreation,
community development and libraries, Danner said.
To put the amount in perspective, Danner said $3.4 million funds the
entire budget for the police traffic division.
In Costa Mesa, City Manager Allan Roeder expressed confidence that the
potential $1.5-million loss would not directly affect city services.
Roeder said his optimism is based on the reserve the city maintains
for emergencies and the fact that the city has not yet allocated the
revenue in excess of original estimates combined with savings from last
year’s budget, which is about $4 million to $5 million.
Both Danner and Roeder are also adamant that the final decision should
be appealed.
Today, Sundstrom will ask the Board of Supervisors for outside counsel
for insight into his legal responsibilities in the case.
“I just want to do what’s ultimately right and the most cost-effective
remedy for the citizens. I keep emphasizing that we have some irrevocable
consequences if we move in the wrong direction. I want to wait on an
appeals ruling,” Sundstrom said.
* Deirdre Newman covers education. She may be reached at (949)
574-4221 or by e-mail at o7 deirdre.newman@latimes.comf7 .
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.