CLOSER LOOK -- Homing in on sober living
Lolita Harper
COSTA MESA -- City officials will look Tuesday to a county program to
help loosen the knots they say are tied tight around their hands
regarding sober-living homes.
A county certification program -- four years in the making -- has been
developed by a multi-jurisdictional task force in the hopes that it will
help officials more closely monitor sober-living facilities. The Planning
Commission is scheduled to vote on the certification guidelines at
Tuesday’s meeting.
The Board of Supervisors approved the Orange County Adult and Alcohol
and Drug Sober Living Facilities Certification process in December and it
will go into affect in October, said Orange County Sheriff’s Lt. Fred
Lisanti, who helped develop the process.
The program requires county certification for any sober-living
facility that wants business from the county -- from the courts or
probation department. Certification is voluntary, Lisanti said, but
without it, homes will lose out on business.
Elizabeth Henderson, an assistant district attorney at the Harbor
Justice Center, agreed.
“If a judge orders [someone to go to a sober-living home], there has
to be a way for the court to know a little about the place,” Henderson
said. “The court can have a little more faith that these places are
actually helping people get sober and therefore deterring future
criminality.”
Perry Valantine, Costa Mesa’s director of planning, said city
officials are anxious for the program to kick in. The planning department
has recommended the commission adopt the certification guidelines.
“We are hoping it will give us a little better handle on the [the
group home problem] and address some of the issues,” he said.
Calling Costa Mesa home
According to a 2001 report, Costa Mesa hosts 106 “group homes,” a
designation that includes foster and elder care facilities, sober-living
homes and drug and alcohol treatment centers.
Sober-living homes have been an especially sore spot for city
officials in recent years. Costa Mesa houses 21 sober living-homes, the
2001 report states, all of which offer no medical treatment and are
therefore exempt from state licensing.
City officials are further frustrated by the fact that state law
severely limits local regulation of group homes. If a group home does not
offer medical assistance or any type of therapy and has six or fewer
residents, it is exempt from city control, Valantine said. Fourteen Costa
Mesa sober-living homes serve six people or less, the report states.
Admittedly, not all the homes are problematic, Valantine said, but
there are those that have been the subject of numerous complaints. Last
summer, the city cracked down on eight such facilities, including
pressing misdemeanor charges on the owner of a sober-living home on
Orange Avenue for allegedly operating in a residential zone.
Valantine said he hopes the county certification program will help the
city tighten the reins without having to wage a court battle.
Neighborly thing to do
The certification process includes a “good neighbor policy” that
encourages sober-living facilities to deal directly with complaints in
order to foster better relationships with neighbors.
Policy suggestions include: making sure neighboring residents know
exactly who to contact regarding complaints; that staff members know how
to receive and file complaints; and that, if legitimate, the home take
immediate steps to remedy identified problems.
The voluntary program also allows for monitoring, including
inspections at least once during each certification period or at any
other “reasonable time” to ensure certification guidelines are being
followed, the report states.
Although it is a county-sponsored program, Lisanti said cities would
share the burden and monitor their own sober-living homes. Data collected
by city officials would be transferred to the sheriff’s department, where
additional positions have been created to administer the program, he
said.
Legitimate sober-living homes should have no problem adhering to the
county guidelines, Lisanti said.
“When you look at these guidelines, you can see that they eliminate
about 90% of the problems that you see in sober-living homes,” Lisanti
said.
Henderson said the certification process aims to eradicate homes that
use the sober-living home moniker as a guise and run flop houses.
“We don’t want people opening up a sober-living home and then dealing
drugs out the back door,” Henderson said. “A lot of these places are run
by former addicts, and that is great; we just don’t want them run by
current ones.”
Getting the right treatment
Jeff Yates, the manager of Morningside Recovery, a Newport Beach-based
business that recently bought an apartment complex in the 1700 block of
Orange Avenue with plans to convert it into a sober-living home,
confirmed the existence of such “flop houses.”
While Morningside Recovery provides a very structured, sober
environment, Yates said he is well aware of industry colleagues who do
not.
“There are those out there and they fly under the radar,” Yates said.
“They are like frat houses for drug addicts.”
Yates expressed interest in applying for the county certification
program. He said it is always best to cover all the bases and make sure
the home doesn’t lose out on business.
Morningside Recovery is not as concerned with getting court-appointed
clients as it is assuring its clients that the recovery home is endorsed
by the court or probation system, Yates said.
“If one of our clients’ lawyers sends them here while they are
awaiting a court date, we want them to know that they can go into that
court saying they’ve just spend X amount of time in a court-OKed
program,” Yates explained. “More often than not, a judge will apply that
time as time spent. But not if you’re not on their list.”
Yates, an industry veteran, said the certification process sounds like
a solid idea but questioned the impact it would have on Costa Mesa.
Previously, city officials have pointed to Proposition 36 -- which
passed in November of 2000 and allows certain drug and alcohol offenders
to seek rehabilitation instead of jail time -- as the source of a recent
surge of group homes in Costa Mesa. Yates disagreed, saying the city has
always been a hotbed for sober-living facilities.
Sober-living homes are popular in high-income areas where recreational
drugs are popular. When family members discover a drug addiction, they
have plenty of money to shell out to sober their loved one up, he said.
Therefore, group homes have done well in Costa Mesa, Newport Beach and
Huntington Beach.
And when high-income people get caught in illegal drug or alcohol
activity, they have high-priced lawyers who can get them out of serving
jail time and into a recovery home instead.
“Proposition 36 just allows people with lower incomes the opportunity
to do what rich people were doing anyway,” Yates said. “People have
always had the opportunity to go to a treatment home instead of jail; you
just had to have a lawyer to do it.”
* Lolita Harper covers Costa Mesa. She may be reached at (949)
574-4275 or by e-mail at o7 lolita.harper@latimes.comf7 .
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.