Mailbag - May 30, 2002
So now Ralph Bauer is going to propose his own plan for districts? He
has described the initiative to create five districts and have each
council member voted on from his or her own district, as nothing short of
Armageddon, and now he is forming the “better government” committee to
propose a district initiative of his own?
Sounds like King Ralph is up to his old tricks, but this time the
community has had a much longer period of time to catch on to his
deceptions and we will not be fooled again. I look forward to the
Independent attending this farce of a meeting and asking the tough
questions for the sudden flip-flop in Bauer’s position.
If the council majority wants to understand why the petitions are
being signed so readily, I suggest they look no further than the scams
like this they’ve been running on us for several years.
LEONARD HEARIN
Huntington Beach
Looks like King Ralph is up to his old tricks to manipulate another
election. How can he, with a straight face, go on record as opposing the
very concept of districts and then expect us to believe his motives are
pure when he comes up with this “Good Government” committee?
There is only one true “Good Government,” and that is the one of the
people, by the people and for the people. The people are expressing their
desires by eagerly signing the petition to create a more fair,
accountable city government through district representation.
Councilman Bauer hopes to dilute the will of the people by concocting
some phony baloney initiative that would create seven districts and have
all members still voted on by the general population.
This would be the worst possible scenario, as it holds no district
representative accountable to their own district. They could completely
ignore their own neighbors as long as they could amass enough votes
outside their district to win an election.
Worse yet, a candidate could use his or her district as a sacrificial
lamb to achieve a hidden agenda that benefits another district more.
The “Good Government” committee is a sham and Bauer knows it.
Hopefully, the Independent will not practice their usual subjective
journalism when the battle for “Best Government” really heats up.
KEN NEIN
Huntington Beach
Baugh’s proposal attempts to take over city government
While I completely agree with the thrust of Tom Livengood’smessage in
his “Sounding Off” article (‘Downsizing council is a huge mistake’,
5/16/02), it did not go far enough in exposing the massive fraud being
perpetrated on the Huntington Beach voters by Scott Baugh and his
cronies.
It’s not just dividing the city into districts or reducing the number
of council members from seven to five. It’s the Machiavellian motives of
the “initiators” that should have us worried.
The “Baugh Brigade” is advocating nothing less than a “hostile
takeover” of our local government achieved through a classic divide and
conquer strategy that would not only weaken our local government but have
our citizens at each others’ throats.
Livengood got it right, but not all right. Baugh’s districting scheme
is the “Trojan Horse” of political initiatives this year, and local
voters would be wise to reject it.
TIM GEDDES
Huntington Beach
Current system is democracy in action
Tarnished former Assemblyman Scott Baugh is doing the bidding of the
ethically challenged power industry to fix something that isn’t broken.
The last Huntington Beach City Council election had no shortage of
candidates (20 of them in fact), including candidates aligned with
environmentalists and candidates aligned with developers. As it turned
out, the pro-environmental
candidates received more votes than the developer candidates, and so
Huntington Beach now has a pro-environmental city council.
Sounds like democracy in action to me.
Rather than implementing a district-based council scheme, people
unhappy with the current council should actually bother to register to
vote, educate themselves on the issues, and then show up at the polls on
election day.
MARK BIXBY
Huntington Beach
Districts are a good idea Baugh’s way -- not Bauer’s
Did I read correctly? Ralph Bauer, staunch opponent of all things
regarding districts, is now jumping on the bandwagon?
If he thinks the majority of voters will be fooled by this latest ploy
to distract us from the real issue of taking back our government from a
few, then he must share Mayor Debbie Cook’s opinion that we’re all “slow
learners” out here.
These kinds of deceptive games are exactly the reason our city is
embracing the idea of districts and why we don’t trust this City Council.
Bauer should be ashamed of himself for even trying to pull this.
Districts are a good idea for our city. Bauer’s proposal would put the
facade of creating districts on an initiative that would leave things
pretty much as they are now.
Since he’s leaving office in November, it makes you wonder who he’s
got in mind to fill the vacancies and why districts would mess up his
plan. Sounds very fishy to me.
JIM MAYFIELD
Huntington Beach
I have been a Huntington Beach resident for over 34 years.
I understand that Scott Baugh, the mouth for the power company, in
trying to district our city has been quoted as saying, “I would look with
suspicion at any council proposal.”
This is incredulous and incongruous that Baugh would use the word
“suspicion.”
This is the same guy that a few years ago in running for election
tried to manipulate the system and outright lied about not knowing Laurie
Campbell. Does the leopard, a stealthy animal, change his spots?
ANDREW L. WENIGER
Huntington Beach
Cleaning the dump will mean more trouble for residents
I don’t know why I can’t work up the same zeal you exhibit regarding
cleanup of the Ascon Dump.
Could it be:
1. The idea of one truck every three to five minutes, 10 hours a day,
six days a week for two years.
2. Those same trucks entering and leaving the area on Magnolia that is
in the proximity of one large high school with errant teen drivers
already, two elementary schools and a middle school with walkers, bikers,
and parents transporting children in and out of the areas.
3. That the $31 million is only a guesstimate. The actual cost,
depending on what is actually found, could go much higher.
4. Uncapping the waste, chemicals, styrene, sulfuric acid, etc. could
literally be like opening a Pandora’s Box of noxious fumes and particles
on residents in the area.
5. The styrene and acid pits will require special removal procedures
apart from the removal of drilling mud and solids.
6. Some of us just don’t cotton to the idea of paying for developers
to develop. They want to clean it up and make millions, so let them pay
for it and still make millions.
Personally, I’ll stick with the dump for many years to come in light
of the aforementioned. And I like the sound of the coyotes at night
too. It beats a thundering dump truck any day. Find something else to
get excited about like AES trying to “district” our City Council out of
business. I’ll leave that for another day.
MERLE MOSHIRI
Huntington Beach
Sewage has come back so lose the waiver
We didn’t have to be rocket scientists to know that there is more than
one source accountable for the ocean contamination -- but, the studies
showed (even though they are not complete until October) that the Orange
County Sanitation District’s plume of contaminated sewage could possibly
come to shore.
The fact that it has, should not be overlooked. The district’s waiver
is not good for the public’s health or the ocean’s health. The Orange
County Sanitation District sends 240 million gallons a day of half
advanced primary treated sewage into the ocean and have since 1985. This
June the sanitation district has to either ask for an extension of the
waiver for another five years or comply with the Clean Water Act and go
to full secondary. There are 16,000 sanitation district’s in the US that
have full secondary treatment. And 34 districts have the waiver, of which
Orange County is the largest. Orange County Sanitation District -- do us
a favor, get rid of the waiver.
EILEEN MURPHY
Huntington Beach
Plume movement is no secret, its Santa Ana winds
In response to your article of May 23, please let me propose a
scenario I have not heard brought to the table for discussion. As a
lifelong resident of Southern California beach communities, 30 years in
Malibu and 25 years in Orange County, I have had a chance to observe the
beach from both the surface and beneath it.
Longtime surfers and skin divers are familiar with the thermocline
phenomena. One of the more interesting factors is the Santa Ana wind. The
normal onshore wind conditions on our coast cause the upper and warmer
waters to move toward the beaches where the less dense, warmer water is
held above the colder water.
During the offshore Santa Ana winds, the warm surface waters are blown
out to sea causing the up welling of cold subsurface waters. This
condition is well known to coastal dwellers, and it has amazed me that
the sewage district is trying to hide their untreated water under an
unstable thermocline. I would suggest using the wind direction and water
temperature information published daily in the Los Angeles Times to
attempt to correlate this effect with pollution reports, and further to
start testing water quality conditions during and after the offshore
winds.
As a longtime diver in the coastal waters, I have enjoyed the water
clarity (but not the cold) following the Santa Ana wind. This is brought
about when the water from offshore replaces the dirty water near land.
Now it appears that to reduce costs and avoid upgrading the treatment
of Orange County’s waste water we will lose any chance of enjoying clean
healthy water at our beaches.
NICK OVERFIELD
Huntington Beach
Hearthside should build, Land Trust should go away
It has been years since the Bolsa Chica saga began and no one has come
forth with any rational offer to purchase the mesa. The Bolsa Chica Land
Trust whines that the landowner should have to give them a “fair” price.
Who says?
If someone just decides they’d like to buy my house, without a “for
sale” sign out front, then they had better come to the door with an offer
I can’t refuse. It’s not up to me to accommodate the busybody, any more
than it is up to Hearthside to accommodate the Land Trust.
On the other hand, the guy wanting to buy my house probably wouldn’t
have a couple of goons behind him to rough me up -- like the City Council
and California Coastal Commission.
Hearthside should be allowed to build and the Land Trust should be
“allowed” to disappear.
TIFFANY ROBINSON
Huntington Beach
Hearthside’s land is private property, build away
Should Hearthside Homes be allowed to build? That this question is
even posed regarding private property is a sad statement on the state of
affairs in our city.
It seems that anyone these days can stick their nose into something
and make it an issue. The Independent does not help matters by presenting
a knee-jerk response to every “environmental” issue that comes along.
Your editorials are tiresome and predictable where Bolsa Chica is
concerned.
Absolutely Hearthside should be allowed to build on their property.
KASEY MAURIS
Huntington Beach
Regarding the question of whether Hearthside homes should be allowed
to build 388 homes on the property they own -- the answer is emphatically
yes.
I can’t wait until we have the new district policy in place and our
city will have to concentrate on issues of importance to the citizens
instead of these pet projects that have wasted millions of our taxpayer
dollars on over the years. How much have they spent on lobbyists, special
meetings, consultants, etc?
Let’s see the Independent do some digging and find out the answer to
that question.
ED LAIRD
Huntington Beach
Hearthside Homes should be allowed to build their development on the
mesa. I think it is curious that the groups like the Amigos and Land
Trust spend so much of their time and energies on fighting everything,
instead of producing anything of value themselves.
For instance, if they wasted less money on court cases and propaganda
campaigns -- not to mention self-congratulatory parties -- perhaps they
could channel their funds toward restoration of the degraded wetlands,
which is already in a budget shortfall.
The City Council, too, might find better ways to indulge their
obsession with Bolsa Chica, like protecting the homes that abut the
wetlands from the rise in the water table that will occur with
restoration.
It’s time to hold these elitists accountable for something other than
just saying “no.”
DEBRA RUNGO
Huntington Beach
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.