District pushing for Proposition 47
Deirdre Newman
When a $110-million bond measure for school improvements passed
two years ago, proponents expected to get a chunk of money from the
state to help in the upgrading and modernizing of 28 district
schools.
What they didn’t expect was a court decision and high demand to
drain money from the state schools facilities program faster than
they could become eligible for it.
But that is precisely what happened, said Paul Reed, assistant
superintendent. And it is why the Harbor Council PTA is urging
Newport-Mesa residents to vote “yes” on Proposition 47, a
$13.05-billion bond initiative for building and upgrading K-12
schools, college and universities.
“These are the matching funds that will help us complete our
improvements at each of the sites, and we are counting on the voters
and our community in particular to vote ‘yes’ so we can have a
completion of the work that has been outlined at each site,” said
Patty Christiansen, Harbor Council president.
The district launched its facilities improvement program two years
ago after residents passed Measure A, authorizing $110 million in
bonds that is paying for two-thirds of the modernization.
The amount of the bond was calculated from a master plan, which
assumed approximately $53 million in state funding. The district’s
funding eligibility in two years has increased to $61 million.
The district schools were divided into four groups based on how
urgent their facility needs are. Construction will start on the
“Group One” schools first.
Even if Proposition 47 passes, it will probably only provide
funding for the first three groups of schools, Reed said, because the
state funding process is lengthy and because there is so much demand
for funding around the state.
There are currently more than 2,000 projects around the state
counting on Proposition 47 funding, according to the California
School Boards Assn.’s October newsletter.
“The state is always running behind in school facilities,” Reed
said. “The state should be building a school every day to keep up
with enrollment demand in the state of California.”
Group Four schools will probably have to wait for a $12-billion
state bond measure on the March 2004 ballot, Reed said.
Leaving the state money up to voters’ whims puts the district in a
precarious position that Measure A supporters did not anticipate,
said Jill Money, one of the measure’s co-chairs.
“I could not have worked harder on [Measure A] and I feel
personally responsible having gone to the voters and having asked for
the money based on the master plan,” Money said.
“Now I feel that the state has embarrassed all of us by not
allowing us to fund the projects that we promised the voters,” he
said. “I feel sorry for our district.”
* DEIRDRE NEWMAN covers education. She may be reached at (949)
574-4221 or by e-mail at deirdre.newman@latimes.com.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.