Westside committee pushes old bridge idea
Lolita Harper
The committee charged with designing a working future for the
Westside narrowly recommended last week that the City Council pay for
studies on the economic effects of what has long been a contentious
proposal for the city: a bridge at 19th Street.
Resident and committee member Robert Graham led the charge to
recommend a study of the bridge, as he has been personally asking the
council to do for more than a year.
Graham contends the City Council majority opposes a bridge at 19th
Street but has formed that opinion without relevant data. He said the
council can’t make an educated decision until more studies have been
done.
The Community Redevelopment Action Committee, which barely had
enough members present Thursday to take an official action, voted 22
to 9 to ask council members to consider allocating money for
extensive studies on the bridge’s feasibility.
A bridge at 19th Street that would cross from Costa Mesa to
Banning Avenue in Huntington Beach is scheduled to be built to
relieve the area’s traffic woes, according to county master plans.
The bridge has been a point of contention for more than a decade
among Costa Mesa residents and leaders, with opponents saying the
bridge will make 19th Street a mini-highway for people traveling from
Huntington Beach to the Costa Mesa Freeway.
Graham and other proponents, however, believe the bridge could
connect the isolated Westside to the beach and give residents better
access to the coast. He has also argued that more traffic through the
city will result in more people visiting and spending money here.
“This shows that people now want to understand what the road to
Huntington Beach could do for that community over there,” Graham
said. “I think it is a major victory to try to get some sanity in
that whole situation over there.”
Costa Mesa, Newport Beach and Huntington Beach leaders would have
to form a consensus to get the bridge deleted from the Orange County
Transportation Authority’s master plan. So far, that has proven no
easy task.
Committee member Martin Millard said the council’s reaction to the
recommendation will be the first test of how much city leaders trust
the committee and how much weight its recommendations will carry.
Councilman Gary Monahan said he can understand Graham’s push for a
study but can’t justify spending more taxpayer money for a study when
there is not overwhelming support from any of the city’s leaders to
build a bridge.
“I think the reality is that a bridge is not going to be built,”
Monahan said. “I would expect that their recommendation will be taken
into consideration, but I just don’t see it in our budget.”
The Community Action Redevelopment Committee, which has been
criticized for being too large and too bureaucratic, had about 75
members a few months ago but had been whittled down to 62 active
members by Thursday.
Only 33 members were at the meeting, with 32 needed for an
official vote, said Mike Robinson, the city’s planning and
development manager.
“They just barely had a quorum and they just barely had the 70%
needed to make the recommendation,” Robinson said.
Since Thursday, one other member has resigned, leaving the active
number at 61, he said.
* LOLITA HARPER covers Costa Mesa. She may be reached at (949)
574-4275 or by e-mail at lolita.harper@latimes.com.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.