UC regents delay ruling on grades
Marisa O’Neil
University of California’s board of regents on Thursday voted to
postpone a decision on a proposal that would have increased the
minimum grade-point average required to get into the system’s
schools.
The UC Academic Senate earlier this month recommended that regents
tighten up admissions standards after a May report from the
California Postsecondary Education Commission saying too many
students were getting into UC schools. Critics of the plan argued
that the universities should be increasing access to students, not
limiting it.
“I’m pushing for more rigor, a more challenging curriculum,” state
Supt. of Public Instruction Jack O’Connell said. “I want students to
be eligible [for UC]. This discourages students. More students are
eligible for college. We should be celebrating, not try to dissuade
people from attendance.”
O’Connell is pleased with the delay because it will give regents
more time to review admissions data, he said.
The proposed tightening of standards came in response to the
commission’s report that showed 14.4% of graduating high school
seniors were meeting UC’s eligibility criteria. The state’s Master
Plan for Education, which outlines higher education in California,
calls for 12.5% to be eligible.
Under the plan, the system would raise the minimum GPA from 2.8 to
3.1.
That would reduce eligibility rates for white students from 16.1%
to 14.2%, according to UC data. Eligibility would drop from 6.3% to
4.7% for black students and from 6.5% to 5.5% for Latino students.
“This would affect students of all backgrounds,” UC spokesman Brad
Hayward said. “The faculty worked very hard to come up with a
proposal that both emphasized academic quality and had the least
possible impact on any one group.”
Regents approved two aspects of the plan that are largely
procedural, including how to calculate GPAs. Those will take effect
for the coming school year.
The proposed GPA increase and a proposal to keep eligibility
levels at 12.5% would start with the entering freshman class of 2007.
“The regents acted very responsibly,” said George Blumenthal, vice
chair for UC’s academic senate. “They were very wise to enact those
changes that would take place immediately.”
Blumenthal, who sits on the committee that recommended the plan,
said he still expects the regents to approve the remaining changes.
Regents will likely meet in mid-August to vote on the proposed
changes, as well as the system’s budget, Hayward said.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.