Blix criticizes weak evidence of Iraqi arms
Michael Miller
Hans Blix, the former United Nations chief weapons inspector who
often questioned the United States in its rush to war in Iraq, spoke
to a receptive crowd on Thursday in UC Irvine’s Distinguished Fellows
Series.
In the free hour-long speech, held before a packed room in the
campus Social Science Lecture Hall, Blix chastised the Bush
administration for what he viewed as weak evidence on Iraq’s weapons
of mass destruction, but he also acknowledged the difficulty in
dealing with rogue states in a world fast developing nuclear arms.
“I sometimes wonder what the world would think of the U.N.
Security Council today if it had authorized war in March 2003,” Blix
told the crowd. Soon after, he added, “The closer we got to the day
of unleashing armed action, the weaker the evidence looked.”
Blix’s statements were supported by a largely enthusiastic
audience, which applauded a number of his remarks about U.S. foreign
policy. However, Blix offered both sides of the argument on Iraq,
noting that Saddam Hussein had lost the trust of most of the world by
playing “cat and mouse” with U.N. weapons inspectors.
Blix also spoke about nuclear tensions among other countries,
particularly Iran and North Korea. He said he was “pessimistic for
the short term, but optimistic for the long term,” praising the
efforts of the international Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in
keeping peace between nuclear weapons states.
The world, Blix contended, had changed since the treaty was signed
in 1968, as economics and other factors had brought many countries
closer together. He said he did not foresee a nuclear conflict
between superpowers, as many feared during the Cold War.
“We are linked to each other and interdependent,” Blix said.
Spectators grew most involved in the lecture when Blix turned his
focus to America’s handling of the war in Iraq. The crowd broke into
applause when Blix mentioned the lack of weapons of mass destruction,
and when he referred to the Bush administration’s case for the war as
“faith-based intelligence.”
Later, the speaker got a laugh when he dryly noted, “The book I
have written, ‘Disarming Iraq,’ has stayed on the nonfiction list.”
The lecture followed a number of others this year by speakers who
largely sided with the Bush administration’s views. Among the
previous guests in the 2004-05 Distinguished Fellows Series were
former U.S. Assistant Attorney General Viet D. Dinh and former
Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar, who supported the invasion
of Iraq.
Last February, the campus drew protests from a number of faculty
and students who opposed the appearance of John Choon Yoo, a former
Justice Department official. Yoo had helped to draft a controversial
2002 memo concerning torture laws, which many believed had paved the
way for prisoner abuses at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay.
Cecelia Lynch, the director of UCI’s Center for Global Peace and
Conflict Studies, who invited Blix to the series, said she hadn’t
known about the other speakers when she contacted him. Every year in
the Distinguished Fellows Series, the center invites a major
political figure to speak to students. The center dubs the event the
annual Margolis Lecture, after UCI professor emeritus Julius
Margolis.
“The Margolis lecture should be a major figure in foreign policy
or arms control,” Lynch said. “Dr. Blix was actually our first choice
this year.”
Hamida Desoqi, an Irvine teacher who got an autograph from Blix
after the lecture, said she had come to the event largely for
enlightenment.
“I was glad to be here and hear him speak live,” Desoqi said. “I
don’t know his political views. That’s why I came to hear him.”
* MICHAEL MILLER covers education and may be reached at (714)
966-4617 or by e-mail at michael.miller@latimes.com.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.