First half of land-use plan approved
The city of Newport Beach on Thursday overcame one huge hurdle in
creating a state-required local coastal plan, but the work isn’t over
yet.
The California Coastal Commission unanimously approved the
land-use portion of Newport Beach’s local coastal plan at a Thursday
meeting in San Diego. Environmentalists cheered the decision because
the commission agreed with its staff rather than the city on two
disputed items -- how to define wetlands and how far to set back
buildings from coastal bluffs.
“We accepted those modifications,” Newport Beach Assistant City
Manager Sharon Wood said. “We studied them some more and decided that
it’s something we can live with.”
As the commission approved it, the plan will require buildings on
coastal bluffs in Dover Shores, Shorecliffs and other neighborhoods
to be set back 25 feet from the bluff’s edge. The city wanted to use
the setbacks of existing development as a guide rather than a strict
25 feet.
But the 25-foot rule won’t be absolute.
“People can apply for exceptions to it, which the Coastal
Commission itself has approved,” Wood said.
The city and the commission also disagreed on what to do if it’s
not clear whether a piece of land qualifies as a wetland. The
commission rejected the city’s request to consider regulations from
other environmental agencies when there’s a question over whether
something is a wetland.
Newport Beach environmental activist Jan Vandersloot said he’s
glad the two sides came to an agreement on the coastal land use plan.
The changes the city wanted would have weakened environmental
protections along the coast, he said.
“If the city had been able to modify how wetlands ... and coastal
bluffs were defined, then that would set a really bad precedent for
the rest of the state,” he said.
“They won’t be able to do more aggressive chopping into or down
the sides of coastal bluffs, which is what the city was trying to
do.”
Wood said the city wasn’t trying to weaken coastal protections but
to avoid creating a policy that would require many exceptions, which
the commission now ends up considering.
“What we wanted to do was say it up front rather than writing a
policy that we knew wouldn’t apply in certain cases,” she said.
The City Council now has six months to decide whether to adopt the
land-use plan as the commission approved it. If that happens, the
city will create rules to enforce what’s in the land-use plan and
rules for how people can apply for exceptions to it.
The commission also must approve the enforcement portion, a
process Wood said could take more than a year.
When both halves of the plan are approved, the city can take over
granting some coastal development permits that now must come from the
Coastal Commission.
Vandersloot said he’s happy with Thursday’s decision, but he’ll
stay involved to make sure the enforcement regulations uphold the
environmental protections promised in the land use plan.
QUESTION
Is the Coastal Commission’s land-use plan too strict? Call our
Readers Hotline at (714) 966-4664 or send e-mail to
o7dailypilot@latimes.com. f7Please spell your name and tell us your
hometown and phone numbers for verification purposes only.
* ALICIA ROBINSON covers government and politics. She may be
reached at (714) 966-4626 or by e-mail at
o7alicia.robinson@latimes.comf7.
All the latest on Orange County from Orange County.
Get our free TimesOC newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Daily Pilot.