Advertisement

COMMUNITY COMMENTARY:Newport Center Park -- Keep the promise

Share via

With all the attention given to the so-called Ficker Plan to build City Hall at Newport Center Park, I feel compelled to share a concept that the City Hall Building Committee, of which I am a member, is analyzing.

First of all, the basic issue here is not where City Hall should be located but rather the obligation of the City Council to honor the promises and commitments it makes to its citizens.

For more than 15 years, Newport Center Park has been planned and zoned for a park. Many hours of outreach were done with varied interest groups to design a plan for the park that represents a consensus vision of how the park should be developed.

Advertisement

The final construction plans are almost done, and funds are budgeted for its construction with a donor willing to assist.

We can debate whether this site should have been a park or city hall, but it is, in fact, a park. It can’t be both. Mr. Ficker should have brought his idea forward many years ago.

Grass on the roof of a building does not make a park. This City Council must honor the contract it made with its citizens when it created this park and not change it into something else.

There is a vision in the plan for this park and it cannot be done with a building underneath it.

For the City Council to change its mind now will be detrimental to the faith citizens have in the integrity of the City Council.

I am sharing the concept of using the Orange County Transportation Authority transit facility and adjacent vacant land because there appears to be this feeling that the only viable option in Newport Center is to use Newport Center Park for the city hall. Nothing could be further from the truth. We are evaluating the police facility site and other opportunities in Newport Center.

The diagram shows:

  • A 72,000-square-foot, two-story city hall on the transit facility site that is not in the view plane of any homes.
  • A relocated transit facility to Avocado Avenue and San Miguel Drive, which would be below the elevation of MacArthur Boulevard and not in anyone’s view plane. Combined with a city hall there is a unique opportunity to create an innovative City Hall/Transit Facility complex.
  • As our transit needs grow over the coming years, this could evolve into a state-of-the art facility that would integrate local transit needs with the transportation authority’s service and improve traffic conditions in our city.

  • All surface parking for City Hall. If site studies show the need for a parking structure, it would only be two levels — similar to the one in front of Circuit City — and would be not higher than MacArthur Boulevard and would not block any views.
  • The main entrance would be off San Nicolas Drive, an underutilized street, with secondary access of San Joaquin Hills Road and possibly San Miguel, although this would be a possible opportunity to limit access from San Miguel and thereby improve traffic flow at this intersection. Traffic studies are needed on this to determine what is best.
  • Newport Center Park would remain as designed, as would the library.
  • The total property would be 8.5 acres — approximately three acres for the Transit Facility and 5.5 acres for the City Hall.
  • More detailed study is needed to bring this concept to fruition as there are many details to work out. However, it is far more feasible than the Ficker Plan.
  • What the diagram shows is a Civic Center for our city stretching from San Joaquin Hills Road to the library along MacArthur Boulevard.

    The City Hall structure anchors it at one end and the library at the other, with the transit facility and Newport Center Park in-between. This is only one concept the building committee is looking at.

    What it shows is that thoughtful consideration is going into locating a city hall and that it is not necessary to go back on a promise to our citizens and sacrifice a park to obtain a new city hall.


  • EDWARD SELICH is a Newport Beach city councilman and mayor pro tem. He serves District 5.

  • Advertisement