Commentary: The city says not to jump from Lido bridge, but I say look before you leap

Re: “Those who jump from Lido bridge either can’t read or are overcome with entitlement”: As one of those “so-called adults” who has successfully jumped off of the Lido Bridge without facing any of the horrible outcomes you describe, I have to say that I am indeed entitled.

Having two eyes, a pair of ears and a brain has entitled me to have a bit of harmless fun when I can use those assets to make sure no boats are passing beneath the bridge before I take the plunge. As long as I have an individual below whom I can trust to call out and let me know that the waterway is clear, then I will keep jumping.

Saying the jumpers aren’t considering the possible ramifications completely misses the fact that folks successfully jump there all the time. To take the plunge while averting tragedy requires a clear assessment of the moment’s conditions, and in that way, all these fun-seeking individuals are acting with a deep sense of responsibility.

Moreover, if the Lido bridge were the actual death trap you paint it to be, the city would do more than just put up signs — it would put up fencing or other obstacles to make jumping much more difficult. Clearly, the minimal concern is (rightly) commensurate to the minimal risk.

Yes, I can read. Those signs telling folks not to jump merely help absolve the city of liability, and they’re a good idea, like posting a speed limit. Mr. Price, surely you’ve never gone faster than 65 mph on any of our Southern California highways, given your strict obedience of signage and concern for the well-being of others?

Newport already has a bad rap for its curmudgeonly citizens who shake their fists at all the young whippersnappers out there. We don’t need to add to the mix with yet another unnecessary outrage.

RICK JOHNSON lives in Newport Beach.