Advertisement

Trump and the federal election case against him: Key passages from prosecutors’ latest filing

People, left, push at metal barriers as they face a line of officers in neon and black clothing near a white building
Insurrectionists loyal to President Trump try to breach a police barrier on Jan. 6, 2021, at the Capitol in Washington.
(Julio Cortez / Associated Press)
Share via

Donald Trump “laid the groundwork for his crimes” well before election day in 2020. He said “the details don’t matter” when told his election fraud claims would fail in court. And his response to learning that then-Vice President Mike Pence was taken to a secure location as rioters stormed the Capitol?

“So what?”

That’s according to a 165-page court filing from special counsel Jack Smith’s team that paints a portrait of a president so desperate to cling to power that he “resorted to crimes” after losing the 2020 election to Democrat Joe Biden.

The filing unsealed Wednesday provides a glimpse into the evidence and testimony prosecutors plan to present if the case accusing Trump of an illegal scheme to overturn the 2020 election ever reaches trial.

Advertisement

The Republican presidential nominee has maintained that he did nothing illegal and has characterized the case as an attempt to hurt his bid to reclaim the White House in November. Trump’s lawyers who have pushed to dismiss the case will now get a chance to respond in court to prosecutors’ claims.

Federal prosecutors say in a newly unsealed court filing that Donald Trump “resorted to crimes” in a failed bid to cling to power after losing the 2020 election.

Oct. 2, 2024

Here are some of the key passages from the filing:

Trump laid the groundwork for his scheme early, prosecutors say

Prosecutors allege Trump started laying the foundation for his illegal scheme well before election day, refusing to say in the months leading up to it whether he would accept the results and suggesting he could lose only if there was fraud.

Advertisement

Three days before the election, a Trump political advisor told a group of supporters that the then-president was “going to declare himself the winner” no matter the outcome, according to prosecutors.

“That doesn’t mean he’s the winner, he’s just going to say he’s the winner,” the advisor said.

Trump “did exactly that” immediately after the election, prosecutors said. Then, in the days following the election, Trump’s allies “sought to create chaos” at polling places where votes were still being counted, Smith’s team alleges.

Advertisement

When a campaign employee was told about a batch of votes in Detroit that appeared to be heavily in favor of Biden, the employee told a colleague to “find a reason” that wasn’t right and “give me options to file litigation.”

Prosecutors and defense lawyers are clashing in a Washington courtroom over the next steps in the federal election interference prosecution of Donald Trump.

Sept. 5, 2024

When the colleague suggested there would be unrest, the campaign employee responded: “Make them riot” and “Do it!!!” according to the filing.

‘The details don’t matter,’ Trump told an advisor

Prosecutors are trying to show that Trump knew his election fraud claims were bogus because many in his circle told him that there was no fraud and that he actually lost the election. Prosecutors say Trump disregarded those assurances just like he disregarded “dozens of court decisions that unanimously rejected his and his allies’ legal claims.”

In one key moment detailed in the filing, prosecutors say a lawyer who represented the former president during his first impeachment trial told Trump that his election fraud claims wouldn’t survive in court. Trump responded: “The details don’t matter,” according to prosecutors.

Prosecutors say they will introduce evidence that shows Trump and his allies “made up figures from whole cloth” about election fraud, detailing how they repeatedly changed their baseless claims on the numbers of noncitizens voting in Arizona.

Advertisement

Details of Trump’s relentless pressure on Pence

One of the most illuminating sections of the filing details the relentless pressure campaign that Trump and his allies enlisted against Pence, beginning well before election dy and running up to the final minutes of the Jan. 6, 2021, certification of Biden’s win.

Special counsel Jack Smith has filed a new indictment against Donald Trump that keeps the same criminal charges but narrows the allegations against him.

Aug. 27, 2024

Even as most of the details of the former president’s futile attempts to get his running mate to reject Biden’s electoral votes have been well documented, Smith’s latest brief gives an even more granular look at the breakdown between the two men as prosecutors say one sought desperately to cling on to power and the other fought to maintain his unwavering fidelity to the Constitution.

When news organizations, including the Associated Press, called the election for Biden on Nov. 7, Pence saw it as an opportunity to “encourage” Trump “as a friend,” reminding him that he “took a dying political party and gave it a new lease on life,” prosecutors wrote. A few days later, when Trump and his allies were still strategizing ways to overcome the defeat, Pence again reiterated that the next presidential election in 2024 was “not so far off.”

When Pence refused on Dec. 28 to support the various legal cases being pursued by Trump and his close allies in Congress, the filing states that Trump told his vice president that “hundreds of thousands” of people “are gonna hate your guts” and “people are gonna think you’re stupid.” He added, “You’re too honest.”

This went on for days, until the two men met in person one last time before Jan. 6. The Oval Office meeting on the eve of the certification is seen by prosecutors as one of Trump’s last efforts to encourage Pence privately to keep him in power, telling the vice president once again that he had “the power to decertify” the results. “When Pence was unmoved, the defendant threatened to criticize him publicly,” the filing states. “I’m gonna have to say you did a great disservice,” Trump said. The vice president relayed this comment to a member of his team, who saw it as a direct threat “to the point that he alerted Pence’s Secret Service detail.

Advertisement

The judge overseeing the Georgia election interference case has tossed out two counts in the indictment against Donald Trump, and three counts in all.

Sept. 12, 2024

‘So what?’ Trump said when told Pence was rushed to safety

As Trump’s supporters began attacking the Capitol on Jan. 6 to stop the counting of the electoral votes, an aide rushed in to tell the president that Pence had been taken to a secure location. The aide was hoping Trump would “take action to secure Trump’s safety,” prosecutors wrote. Instead, Trump’s only response was: “So what?” prosecutors allege.

Prosecutors say they will present “forensic evidence” from Trump’s cellphone and testimony from witnesses to show how the president spent the afternoon of Jan. 6 on Twitter and watching TV coverage of the riot while his aides pressed him to make a public statement to quell the violence.

“Instead, the defendant refused repeatedly until his advisers gave up and left him alone in the dining room,” prosecutors wrote.

Alone in the dining room, Trump then sent a tweet attacking Pence for not having the “courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify.”

A rioter with a bullhorn read Trump’s tweet about Pence to the crowd that was trying to enter the Capitol, prosecutors said. It was only after advisors again urged Trump to do something about the riot that he sent a tweet encouraging his followers to support law enforcement and “stay peaceful,” prosecutors wrote.

Advertisement

Richer and Amiri write for the Associated Press.

Advertisement